PLEASE EXPLAIN
Sir,-In desperation I turn to you for enlightenment in a matter for which I realise, you are not responsible. In your issue of May 30 there appeared on page 18 a panel with the caption, " Emergency Precautions Scheme" and giving details of special broadcasts in connection with the scheme. Both 4YA and 4ZB were cited as participants in these broadcasts, so at the appointed hour I listened to the national station for the first talk, but the station did not give it, nor did I hear any explanation of its absence, or, for that matter, any apology for its deletion from the advertised programme. Neither were talks on the E.P.S. given on the other preafranged evenings. The next issue of The Listener
containing the programmes for the present week, I noted, again advertised a series of talks from our stations on the scheme, and last Monday I again tried 4YA. Following the chimes re-broadceast from Wellington, a speaker began to talk on the E.P.S., but he was not allowed to proceed very far before being cut off. Our local announcer substituted race results for this talk. Now the point is, is it asking too much of our local stations in such circumstances
to give us an apology and an explanation at times when listeners expect to hear the talks and don’t? There might have been some announcement regarding the deletion of the E.P.S. talks; if so, it must have been at a time when I wasn’t listening. I must explain that I select my programmes carefully and listen only when the advertised items tell me I am to hear something I am interested in, such as E.P.S., for instance. After all this, I revert to my opening sentence. Will you please give me the reason why the talks mentioned were not given after you had been evidently advised by the radio proerammes department that they were to take place?
E.
CLELAND
(Dunedin).
(The departure from the published arrangements was regrettable, but we are informed that it was unavoidable. The time was made available, but not all the persons responsible for the preparation of the scripts were able to have them ready, and the series was postponed for four weeks.--Ed.)
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19410801.2.10.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 5, Issue 110, 1 August 1941, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
371PLEASE EXPLAIN New Zealand Listener, Volume 5, Issue 110, 1 August 1941, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.