Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PLEASE EXPLAIN

Sir,-In desperation I turn to you for enlightenment in a matter for which I realise, you are not responsible. In your issue of May 30 there appeared on page 18 a panel with the caption, " Emergency Precautions Scheme" and giving details of special broadcasts in connection with the scheme. Both 4YA and 4ZB were cited as participants in these broadcasts, so at the appointed hour I listened to the national station for the first talk, but the station did not give it, nor did I hear any explanation of its absence, or, for that matter, any apology for its deletion from the advertised programme. Neither were talks on the E.P.S. given on the other preafranged evenings. The next issue of The Listener

containing the programmes for the present week, I noted, again advertised a series of talks from our stations on the scheme, and last Monday I again tried 4YA. Following the chimes re-broadceast from Wellington, a speaker began to talk on the E.P.S., but he was not allowed to proceed very far before being cut off. Our local announcer substituted race results for this talk. Now the point is, is it asking too much of our local stations in such circumstances

to give us an apology and an explanation at times when listeners expect to hear the talks and don’t? There might have been some announcement regarding the deletion of the E.P.S. talks; if so, it must have been at a time when I wasn’t listening. I must explain that I select my programmes carefully and listen only when the advertised items tell me I am to hear something I am interested in, such as E.P.S., for instance. After all this, I revert to my opening sentence. Will you please give me the reason why the talks mentioned were not given after you had been evidently advised by the radio proerammes department that they were to take place?

E.

CLELAND

(Dunedin).

(The departure from the published arrangements was regrettable, but we are informed that it was unavoidable. The time was made available, but not all the persons responsible for the preparation of the scripts were able to have them ready, and the series was postponed for four weeks.--Ed.)

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19410801.2.10.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 5, Issue 110, 1 August 1941, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
371

PLEASE EXPLAIN New Zealand Listener, Volume 5, Issue 110, 1 August 1941, Page 4

PLEASE EXPLAIN New Zealand Listener, Volume 5, Issue 110, 1 August 1941, Page 4

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert