Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STOMACHS ON THE HOME FRONT:

What Are You Eating These Days?

Effect of Budgets on Bodies

Living is costing more, and New Zealanders have less income with which to pay for it. Every man who goes into the army is another man taken away from productive work, and another mouth for those left behind to feed. We must have more food for the nation with less men and women to produce it. We must have more food for the family with less money to buy it. How can these difficulties be resolved? Mr. Nash's Budget takes from the family to give to the nation. It is a statement of an impersonal problem. But the family budget remains a personal problem to which the family must attend unaided. Smaller family incomes must be made to go farther. Every ounce of food must make its contribution to the national health. How is it possible to reduce the cost of meals and yet maintain or increase their nutritive value? How is it possible in war-time to keep the health of the nation at a pitch which will avoid the danger of after-war epidemics? On this page we discuss the situation in the light of recent findings by the New Zealand Women’s Food Value League.

N peace time, New Zealand has made poor use of her natural tiches in home-grown foods. The people of an island with sea coast seldom more than forty or fifty miles from centres of population, have developed endemic goitre, while the antidote, sea-foods, has been within easy reach. The people of a country growing itself heavy fruit crops, and situated close to the richest fruit-growing islands in the world, find fruit too expensive to buy plentifully, and suffer accordingly from nutritional deficiencies. Every nutrition survey made of the country, has illustrated these paradoxes. The most recent survey, conducted in Auckland by the New Zealand Women’s Food Value League, illustrates the unpleasant truth that war-time needs are likely to intensify them, unless the whole population is wakened to the situation. Mainly Sugar and Flour "New Zealand entered the war on an unsound foundation as far as nutrition is concerned," states an editorial comment on the publication in their ‘Bulletin’ of the League’s most recent analysis of a survey conducted in February and March, "She has it in her power to produce nearly all of the most valuable foods, and yet it is well known about us abroad that the protective foods are so expensive that we live mainly on sugar and flour, which are cheap." Considering that the New Zealand public is not questionnaire-minded, the League secured a good reply to its first questionnaire. Mrs. W. G. Kite, secretary of the League’s Housewives’ Committee, which arranged the questionnaire, claims that the -results represent a fair crosssection of the public. Its aim was to

provide some guide on how to spend less money on food to better advantage, and so do something to avoid the danger of anticipated post-war epidemics. Nutrition, Mrs. Kite admitted to a representative of The Listener, was not the only factor in the epidemic danger, but it was an important one. " Food-Conscious "" Group The League, which is centred in Auckland, states that the replies came from a food-conscious group, and that allow-

ance has to be made for the fact that this "eating public’ would probably look after itself better than the average. Smaller incomes -- under £300 per annum-were in the majority. The average size of a family was four or five. Not Enough Wholemeal Special interest was taken in the result of questions relating to the use of wholemeal flour and wholemeal bread,

It was found, even in this food-conscious group, that the consumption figures were substantially below 50 per cent. of the families. The figures were: 36.6 per cent. of the families surveyed used only wholemeal flour; 34.4 per cent. used partly wholemeal partly white; 36.8 per cent. were eating only wholemeal bread; and 18.6 per cent. partly wholemeal partly white, Surprise is registered by the League’s report that the use of wholemeal flour should be more widespread than the use of wholemeal bread. Milk consumption, again taken only from this food-conscious group, was below par-in a rich dairying country! Insufficient Milk The expenditure of 1/4d per week on milk represented, during February of this year, three-quarters of a pint per person daily; compared with the League of Nations specification of one pint daily for adults and one and three-quarter pints for children. In the group surveyed 124 families out of 213 were getting insufficient milk, and it must be remembered that the survey was undertaken before the price rose. The average of three-quartets of a pint meant, of course, that in many cases children as well as adults were getting as little as one-fifth of a pint per day apart from their school ration, while there were cases of children receiving no school ration at all, presumably because of the remoteness of the school attended, The Price of Eggs On eggs 6d was spent, (That amount in terms of eggs is by this time worth only about fifty per cent. of what it was in February). Butter for the week cost 1/3d on the average, meat 1/3d, fish 344d, bread 8d, fruit 11d, vegetables 7d. In February the sixpence worth of eggs represented three. At present it would be about one and a-half. The League of Nations standard for eggs, compared with this frugality in a farming district, is one egg per day for children, and half an egg per day for adults, or more than twice as much as a comparatively well fed class of New Zealander has been getting. Butter consumption was about right, but the virtues of this, the League’s report suggested, were offset by the fact that the nutrition value of butter was less than that of milk, and the consumption of milk was less than it should be, Fruit, Vegetables, Meat, Fish The 11d spent on fruit, and 7d on vegetables were considered fairly satisfactory, but it was pointed out that the teplies came from sources which secured supplies from home gardens and fruit trees and that, in any case, there was evidence to show that even with this consideration the money spent on these necessary foods was above the New Zealand average. The meat consumption from this group was satisfactory, and well below the New Zealand average. But the small amount paid for fish give rise to serious

thought. "Fish is an important item in a healthy diet," says the report. "The explanation of this very low figure lies partly in the high price of fish and partly in the fact that for many people living in country districts it is unobtainable, or, if obtainable, is never fresh. Among the many letters accompanying replies to the questionnaire were frequent complaints of the high price of fish and of its scarcity in a country where the export trade in fish is on the increase." The comparatively small rising tendency in the cost of living noticeable in February was found by the Auckland investigators to be persuading housewives to cut down on supplies of food in the following order: Meat and fish tied for first place, then came fruit, eggs, groceries, and milk. "Less meat," was the comment, "is all to the good, but it must be remembered once again that this is a foodconscious group and that meat would probably not come first for sacrifice in an average cross-section, Eggs would probably come higher up the list if they were not already on the minimum; to cut them down further would probably eliminate them altogether. Milk, it is fairly safe to say, would have been nearer the top, too, if the questionnaire had been put out after the increase in price." Cost Per Head The League found that the total amounts spent on food per head per week by the group under review ranged from 5/4d to 22/-. The first figure applied to a family of five receiving bread free and the second to a couple that ate only two meals a day! Of the total families reviewed, 47.7 per cent. spent between 10/- and 14/per head per week on food; 27.4 per cent. between 6/- and 10/-; and 16.6 per cent. between 14/- and 18/-. At present (Continued on next page)

(Continued from previous page) food prices, it was stated, the group spending only 6/- to 10/- a week were probably well below the good health standard specified by the League of Nations. Applying these figures to a hypothetical family living in Auckland or Wellington, where costs are higher than in the South Island, The Listener finds that a father must spend about £2 per week for his four-or five-roomed house. He will be lucky if he gets a good home for the money, and luckier still if he finds one vacant at the price. If he finds none vacant, and he has to house a family of two, his rent for a flat will cover anything from two to three poky rooms for £2/10/- to £3, to slightly better accommodation at £5 per week. Assuming then, that he feeds his family at the scale of from 10/- to 14/per head per week, and has a family of only two children, his costs for rent and food will be at a minimum £4, and to give himself good housing and good food he may have to spend £6 or £7 or more. Paying in Health In these circumstances, even although they apply less severely in other parts of the North Island, and through the South Island, families are forced these days to consider a nutrition budget while they are considering household budgets in relation to the new taxation and the new and steadily rising cost of living. Although it is not possible in this space to follow that statement of the difficulty with a proposition for its cure, we are able to quote the official opinion of the Auckland League, which here covers the national situation only, and in general terms. For the family, it is a case of detailed analysis of food values weighed against food costs. The League says: "It has become more and more obvious that whenever a step is taken in connection with the control or direction of the food supply, the producers or the industry concerned are found well organised to present their point of view. The consumer is not so organised, and is usually not even heard-with the result that he now pays the bill which has been presented to him, and pays it not only with his money, but also with his health, "Already this year we have seen the curtailing of fishermen’s licences to cut off supplies of fresh fish from hundreds of people in a country already worldfamous for the high incidence of goitre. The zoning of milk and bread suppliers, which lies immediately ahead, will be very detrimental to the consumers’ interests unless it is handled with some thought for the real welfare of the consumer, which seems unlikely in the light of past experience. It is difficult enough now to get good wholemeal bread, and when the choice is narrowed down to one or two bakers the position will be hopeless, "Other serious features of recent policy have been the prohibition of pine-

apple imports, and the severe restriction of the imports of codliver oil and other vitamin-rich preparations, That this should happen at a time when luxury items are still coming in in vast quantities shows how far we have to go in educating those who rule us. "In time of war the question of health takes on a degree of importance which some of us would willingly give it in time of peace. How are adults to maintain a sufficient degree of health to weather the long period of struggle and endurance that is ahead of them; and

how are children to grow up with sufficient strength and balance of mind and body to rebuild a world of which vast areas are already in ruins?" The New Questionnaire Speaking of New Zealanders in general (and not merely of the group covered by the first questionnaire), Mrs. Kite said that they ate three times too much meat and three times too much sugar, by comparison with League of Nations standards for good health, Overseas people had some justification in re-

garding us as a race of "cups of tea and cake consumers." We reproduce with this article the second questionnaire issued by the Food Value League. It is more detailed than the previous one. For instance, it seeks information regarding the householder’s income in order that further research may be made into the problem of the effect of high food prices on small budgets. Also this second questionnaire will throw light on food consumption in winter time. Readers can help themselves and their fellows by filling it in.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19400712.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 3, Issue 55, 12 July 1940, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
2,162

STOMACHS ON THE HOME FRONT: What Are You Eating These Days? New Zealand Listener, Volume 3, Issue 55, 12 July 1940, Page 10

STOMACHS ON THE HOME FRONT: What Are You Eating These Days? New Zealand Listener, Volume 3, Issue 55, 12 July 1940, Page 10

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert