Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHO WAS THE BEST FULL-BACK?

Mark Nicholls Has A Tactful Answer

T’S an old game picking the best World ] Rugby fifteen, but it seemed at times during Mark Nicholls’s first talk about his preferences as if he might have a new answer to the first question, "Who was the best full-back?" He obviously liked W. E. Crawford, who played for Ireland against the All Blacks in 1924, and will be remembered by two New Zealanders particularly well: Gus Hart and Jim Parker, whom he brought down with tackles now written into Rugby history. "He was the only full-back who played as well as Nepia. It is, in fact, a question whether he was not a shade the better," said Nicholls. And the speaker obviously liked the Springbok, Morkel, who played in his ninth year of first-class Rugby in 1921. Crawford was 33 years of age when he played against New Zealand, and Morkel was 32. Nicholls suggested that all really great players retained ~ their ability over a long period. Others listed were Kingston and Dave Lindsay (All Blacks), Johnson (Wales), Brough and Bassett (England), Ross (Australia), Tindill, Morkell, and Brand (South Africa). Nicholls said he thought Brand’s kicking superior to that of any other full-back. He ranked Brand with Morkel as the two best full-backs ever to visit New Zealand. About Nepia he had more to say, but nothing so illustrative of Nepia’s ability as this story of play in the Dunedin test against England: From play on New Zealand’s goal line, Nepia found touch at halfway. From the lineout he was given a penalty kick and found touch two yards short of England’s goal line. ith a wet and heavy ball he had covered ~ the length of the field with two kicks. Nicholls believed that others might have been more consistently acdurate, but Nepia’s kicking covered such great distances that no return could hope to make up the ground he gained. Who was the best full-back? ‘a Nicholls was tactful, and not so revolutionary after all.

"If I were an Irishman it would be Crawford. If I were a South African it would be Morkel. But since I am a New Zealander, I say it is Nepia."

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19390901.2.59.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 1, Issue 10, 1 September 1939, Page 51

Word count
Tapeke kupu
368

WHO WAS THE BEST FULL-BACK? New Zealand Listener, Volume 1, Issue 10, 1 September 1939, Page 51

WHO WAS THE BEST FULL-BACK? New Zealand Listener, Volume 1, Issue 10, 1 September 1939, Page 51

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert