Foretastes of forest futures
est Coast conservationists recently confirmed that what happens on the ground can be very different from what Timberlands West Coast claims is involved in ‘sustainable’ logging. An area of forest in the Hokitika Gorge has already been laid waste, according to members of Forest and Bird, the Buller Conservation Group and Native Forest Action who visited there. The area at Doctor’s Creek was dense, rich, rimu forest before it was logged four years ago. Almost all the trees in an area of two or three hectares were felled but only the best part of the best trees was helicoptered out. Dozens of logs and sections of logs were left to rot. Where a log was eight metres long by one metre in diameter, a threemetre section was ‘cut to waste’ to make a smaller load for a helicopter. Above the first limb, a log six metres long by half-a-metre in diameter was left to rot. Another tree was felled two metres above the ground leaving enough timber in the stump to make half-a-dozen dining tables. After a complaint about the waste, Timberlands sent a logging gang back into the forest.
Instead of removing the already fallen four-year-old logs they cut a whole lot more, many in the riparian strip. These too were airlifted out. Local landowners report similar waste in the Grey Valley, near Kumara, and at Mt Stormy, Karamea. The important thing about the Hokitika and Grey Valley areas is that they fall within the Timberlands West Coast ‘sustainable management’ zone. According to the company’s publicity, only one tree per hectare per year is to be removed. The company claims its logging is to the highest international standards, and that larger streams are protected by leaving a riparian strip of trees. The recent photographs from Doctor’s Creek indicate that Timberlands West Coast breaks its own rules. Timberlands West Coast says it has perfected its "sustainable management’ techniques on rimu and is now applying these to beech. Our photographs show what they are actually doing: they are carrying on the same way as loggers of 30 and 40 years ago. The only difference is they now remove the logs by helicopter. — Pete Lusk A pictorial feature on West Coast forests at risk appears on page 24.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/FORBI19991101.2.11.9
Bibliographic details
Forest and Bird, Issue 294, 1 November 1999, Unnumbered Page
Word Count
380Foretastes of forest futures Forest and Bird, Issue 294, 1 November 1999, Unnumbered Page
Using This Item
For material that is still in copyright, Forest & Bird have made it available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This periodical is not available for commercial use without the consent of Forest & Bird. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this magazine please refer to our copyright guide.
Forest & Bird has made best efforts to contact all third-party copyright holders. If you are the rights holder of any material published in Forest & Bird's magazine and would like to discuss this, please contact Forest & Bird at editor@forestandbird.org.nz