Restoring Christchurch's ecological past
IF YOU HAVE trouble thinking of Christchurch as a city of kahikatea and kereru, a guide has been produced to help you. The concept belongs to the Otautahi Christchurch Agenda 21 Committee, a community group promoting the decisions of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and in particular the biodiversity convention signed by New Zealand. The group wants ordinary citizens to feel that protecting and restoring biodiversity is something to which they can contribute directly. As the group’s coordinator, Diana Shand, says: "The task has to be made relevant to people’s capacity and experience. They can relate to planting native sedges along a small stream at the end of the street rather than mowing grass if they understand this will attract insects that will feed the fish that shelter under the sedge." By simply locating their street on a map in the booklet and noting what colour-coded ecosystem it fits into, residents can obtain the associated plant
card (cost 50 cents) which lists trees, shrubs, groundcovers and special niche plants that once called that place their own. The map shows original landforms and existing remnants as well as letting you know what native animals once lived there. As well as gardeners interested in restoring native plant systems and bringing back some native birds, lizards and insects, the plant lists will hopefully help nurseries, planners, schools and council landscapers to understand what belongs naturally to different parts of the city. The first booklet was funded by the city council and covers the southern and western plains of Christchurch. The plan is to follow it with another three booklets covering the rest of the city. Much use has been made of soil maps, historical data, pollen records and existing natural remnants to produce the information. Di Lucas, Forest and Bird executive member and principal of the firm of landscape architects that produced the booklets, says that the project was particularly impressive coming "from the bottom up" as a community initiative.
Although this region is one of the most modified landscapes in New Zealand, said Lucas, the ambitious project looks at "recovery and restoration, not just remnants".
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/FORBI19960201.2.10.4
Bibliographic details
Forest and Bird, Issue 279, 1 February 1996, Page 5
Word Count
357Restoring Christchurch's ecological past Forest and Bird, Issue 279, 1 February 1996, Page 5
Using This Item
For material that is still in copyright, Forest & Bird have made it available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This periodical is not available for commercial use without the consent of Forest & Bird. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this magazine please refer to our copyright guide.
Forest & Bird has made best efforts to contact all third-party copyright holders. If you are the rights holder of any material published in Forest & Bird's magazine and would like to discuss this, please contact Forest & Bird at editor@forestandbird.org.nz