Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Life of a can

Chris Wratt

WHAT HAPPENS to your aluminium soft drink can after you place it in the community recycling bin? Chances are it could be reincarnated as a car part in Japan. After collection, empty cans are transported to processing plants in Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch or Dunedin. Steel cans, nails and any other contaminants are separated before the aluminium is crushed into 25-kg bales. At present there are no facilities for recycling aluminium cans in New Zealand and the crushed cans are all exported. Comalco’s Auckland agent Inmetals sends close to a third of its returns to an aluminium re-melt plant outside Sydney where any remaining impurities are removed and the metal melted down into aluminium sheet for processing into new cans. The remaining aluminium is exported to the market paying the highest price — usually Japan where it is most likely to end up as car parts. Aluminium can be remelted again and again with a metal recovery rate of about 88-90 percent. Producing aluminium from recycled material also requires 95 percent less energy than primary aluminium production. The energy efficiency of the recycling process increases with the volume of recycled cans. The initial energy input required for the manufacture of aluminium cans is greater than tin-plate and glass, but the energy savings from transporting the lighter-weight cans — at one third the weight of their steel alternative and many times lighter than the equivalent glass container — are considerable. For aluminium cans the life-cycle equation is dependent not only on the level of recovery achieved, but also on energy used in collection and delivery of containers for reprocessing. New Zealand’s return rate for aluminium cans has jumped sharply since the launch of Comalco’s recycling scheme in

1987 and is one of the fastestgrowing voluntary schemes in the world. The link between the recycling programme and the kakapo recovery project . has also helped boost the recovery rates. The current rate, around 46 percent, is still con-

siderably lower, however, than return rates in the US (55 percent), Canada (65) and Sweden (85). But return rates may not be all that they seem. Recent research suggests that used aluminium cans retain bever-

age residue or moisture up to 20 percent of their empty weight. Therefore recovery rates calculated by comparing clean virgin cans coming into the market place with the weight of baled cans containing moisture and dirt may artificially inflate the return rates. A new environmental worry has recently arisen in the aluminium industry. Two of the waste gases given off in primary production — tetrafluoromethane and hexafluorethane — have been identified as significant greenhouse gases. Although emitted in small quantities, molecule for molecule they are over 8,000 times more effective greenhouse contributors than carbon dioxide. Research is being done in Canada to see if the production process can be changed to avoid the creation of these gases. The gases are not produced when cans are recycled. Large amounts of carbon dioxide are also emitted in the production of aluminium. Last year New Zealanders returned over 158 million cans for recycling. As well as the energy and resource savings achieved through the recycling, the increased recycling rate resulted in an additional donation by Comalco to the kakapo recovery programme of $25,000.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/FORBI19921101.2.8.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Forest and Bird, Issue 266, 1 November 1992, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
540

Life of a can Forest and Bird, Issue 266, 1 November 1992, Page 5

Life of a can Forest and Bird, Issue 266, 1 November 1992, Page 5

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert