CRA — Turning Up the Heat
S CONCERN about the greenhouse effect increases, governments around the world are increasingly questioning the need for developments which might add to the problem. In New Zealand, however, despite Geoffrey Palmer's and the Ministry for the Environment's rhetoric about the dangers of global warming, Australian giant CRA are proceeding with plans for a coal-fired power station at Marsden Point. The effects of the 1000 MW proposal are major. ¢ 9 million tonnes per year of carbon dioxide will be released — an increase of 22 percent of the total released in New Zealand now. @ 90 million tonnes of coal will move through the site over 30 years, and at any one time there will be 700,000 tonnes of coal stockpiled. e@ 200,000 tonnes of ash will be produced a year, requiring a dumping site of 42 ha over 30 years. e Even if the station's filters are 99.9 percent efficient, 436 kg of fly ash would be emitted each day from the plant’s chimney. e 23,870 tonnes of sulphur dioxide will be released into the atmosphere every year unless CRA filter it out in a very costly process. From a biological point of view the greatest impact of the station will be on the marine life of picturesque Bream Bay. Vast quantities of cold sea water — possibly 3 million tonnes per day — will be sucked in to cool the plant, and then discharged, but it will then be up to 7 degrees Celsius warmer than the surrounding sea water. Marine ecologist Lou Ritchie says there will be massive marine life mortality, especially of the larval stages of fish such as snapper, trevally, Kingfish, kahawai, plus shellfish and crayfish, when up to 3 million tonnes of sea water is pushed through the plant. In Whangarei, locals have formed the group Stop CRA Pollution (SCRAP) to halt the proposal. Despite the enormous environmental risks attached to the project, and the apparent lack of necessity for such a massive plant when New Zealand is already oversupplied with power, the Government is adopting a hands off approach. Under the new de-reg-ulated power supply structure, if CRA can supply energy to the Auckland market cheaper Weds than Electricorp can, then S the coal-fired station could proceed. The proposal points up the need for a national energy policy which takes into accou0000000 factors other than just the short term cost benefits. #
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/FORBI19900501.2.8.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Forest and Bird, Volume 21, Issue 2, 1 May 1990, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
398CRA — Turning Up the Heat Forest and Bird, Volume 21, Issue 2, 1 May 1990, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
For material that is still in copyright, Forest & Bird have made it available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This periodical is not available for commercial use without the consent of Forest & Bird. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this magazine please refer to our copyright guide.
Forest & Bird has made best efforts to contact all third-party copyright holders. If you are the rights holder of any material published in Forest & Bird's magazine and would like to discuss this, please contact Forest & Bird at editor@forestandbird.org.nz