Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Above: We climbed beech trees so we could compare the energy value of honeydew at the top and bottom of the tree. Kaka collect most drops from the canopy level, as the drops there contain more energy. Photo: Peter Wilson

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/FORBI19881101.2.17.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Forest and Bird, Issue 250, 1 November 1988, Page 19

Word count
Tapeke kupu
40

Above: We climbed beech trees so we could compare the energy value of honeydew at the top and bottom of the tree. Kaka collect most drops from the canopy level, as the drops there contain more energy. Photo: Peter Wilson Forest and Bird, Issue 250, 1 November 1988, Page 19

Above: We climbed beech trees so we could compare the energy value of honeydew at the top and bottom of the tree. Kaka collect most drops from the canopy level, as the drops there contain more energy. Photo: Peter Wilson Forest and Bird, Issue 250, 1 November 1988, Page 19

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert