A dangerous move which must be countered
National Conservation Officer
—David G. Collingwood,
AN ATTEMPT to change the National Parks Act to suit the aspirations of deerstalkers and hunters is being made by means of a private member’s Bill. This was announced by a prominent member of Parliament, and it is aimed at halting the removal of wapiti from Fiordland National Park, which is the policy of the National Parks Authority, the Fiordland Park Board, the Wildlife Service, the Minister of Lands and Forests, and of the Society. Further, the private Bill will seek to set up a defined wapiti reserve in the Stuart and Murchison Mountains area of Fiordland National Park where wapiti hunting can take place without the constraints of the Act and to the detriment of the resident takahe. Since its foundation the Society has recognised the damage to vegetation caused
by deer generally and in particular by the wapiti. The Society has documentary evidence of this damage in spite of erroneous arguments to the contrary being used today to allay public concern. Deer and Resulting Devastation in New Zealand, by Roy Nelson, sets the matter straight with evidence from authorities of the past and the present. This evidence 1s incontrovertible and should be heeded by all. Copies of this booklet should be available from branches, but if they are not, head office can supply them for $1 each. The pert 18 -extreme, 4s many members of Parliament are sympathetic to the deerstalking cause, and unless you make your local member of Parliament aware of the real dangers, there is every chance that the Bill will be passed. This would mean that: e The Bill would put all
national parks at risk, areas could be withdrawn at will just to provide hunting reserves for this sporting minority, and the practice of protecting these imported animals in the national parks with all their damage to the natural forests would continue. ¢ The Bill would put at risk the unique Notornis (takahe), one of New Zealand’s most endangered ground walking birds, which occupies the same area as the wapiti and is diminishing as a result of competition for food by the wapiti. This area must be cleared of wapiti, as the Government is now doing, and not made a _ special wapiti hunting area. Please write to, or contact, your member of Parliament and make your views known on behalf of the Society.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/FORBI19820801.2.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Forest and Bird, Volume 14, Issue 3, 1 August 1982, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
402A dangerous move which must be countered Forest and Bird, Volume 14, Issue 3, 1 August 1982, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
For material that is still in copyright, Forest & Bird have made it available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This periodical is not available for commercial use without the consent of Forest & Bird. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this magazine please refer to our copyright guide.
Forest & Bird has made best efforts to contact all third-party copyright holders. If you are the rights holder of any material published in Forest & Bird's magazine and would like to discuss this, please contact Forest & Bird at editor@forestandbird.org.nz