Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SCENIC RESERVES—REAL OR NOMINAL?

Some scenic reserves suffer damage from cattle and other browsing animals, because they are not fenced. This lack of protection is also observable on some sanctuaries for the preservation of native birds which require forests for their welfare. Some of the 4million pounds a year paid by the general public in the taxation of wages and salaries should be available for this purpose. Here, too, is* a proper first call on any revenue derived by the State from the forests, including opossum license fees and royalties.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/FORBI19350201.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Forest and Bird, Issue 35, 1 February 1935, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
90

SCENIC RESERVES—REAL OR NOMINAL? Forest and Bird, Issue 35, 1 February 1935, Page 7

SCENIC RESERVES—REAL OR NOMINAL? Forest and Bird, Issue 35, 1 February 1935, Page 7

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert