Page image
Page image

H.—2B

the intention of Parliament in adopting a Preferential Tariff is essentially to give an advantage to United Kingdom manufactures over those of foreign countries and it was further suggested that where the competition on this market of the products of certain other British Dominions is such as to embarrass the competitive industries of Great Britain, tariff adjustments should be made to carry out effectively the alleged intention of the Legislature. So far as may be judged from the terms of past Tariff legislation it seems clear that the underlying intention of Parliament has been, not only to afford assistance to the manufacturing industries of the United Kingdom, but also to encourage trade within the Empire, and for this reason the Commission cannot agree with the suggestion above referred to and considers that, subject to special Tariff Treaties, the Tariff Schedule should be so framed as to accord similar treatment to all British countries. The effect of the Preferential Tariff is, of course, to grant protection in New Zealand to the products and manufactures of the Empire as against those of foreign countries. It may be mentioned that requests have been made for increases in the margins of preference on the grounds that costs of production (and particularly labour costs) are higher in certain portions of the Empire than on the Continent of Europe. The rates of preference provided by the existing Tariff are generally 10 per cent, or 15 per cent, ad valorem. In a few cases the margin of preference is lower than 10 per cent, and in a few cases higher than 15 per cent. As an indication of the measure of preference accorded under the provisions of the existing tariff we show hereunder the difference between the duty paid during the past four years on goods of British origin as compared with the amount which would have been paid on those goods if the General Tariff rates had been applicable : —■

In the Tariff of 1921 the rates of duty on 66 per cent, of the total number of items provided for preference to British goods as compared with 40 per cent, in the previous Tariff. The following figures show (for the past two years and for the average of the two years prior to the 1921 Tariff) the percentages of our imports from British countries which did and which did not enjoy preferential tariff treatment: —

2—H. 28.

9

Preference (i.e., Duty Concession)!,, r\ j- n • > Imports during Year. j on Goods of United Kingdom j ''^oodi 0 f ' E mpL Origi^ Origin only. ' s £ £ 1923 .. .. .. .. .. 2,922,620 2,558,990 1924 .. .. .. .. .. 3,179,590 2,618,190 1925 .. .. .. .. .. 3,392,900 2,877.010 1926 .. .. .. .. .. 3,294,500 2,590,750

Percentages of Imports during Imports of United Kingdom Origin. rp w0 Years prior to Year 1925. Year 1926. 1921 Tariff. Goods subject to preference— (а) Free of duty, similar foreign goods being dutiable .. 8 33 33 (б) Dutiable, similar foreign goods being dutiable at higher rates 43 47 48 Goods not subject to preference — (a) Free of duty, similar foreign goods also being free of duty 39 12 10 (b) Dutiable, similar foreign goods being dutiable at same rates 10 8 9 Totals for imports of United Kingdom origin .. 100 100 100

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert