Page image
Page image

29

C—l 4,

trunk covered with flaking bark. The juvenile, on the contrary, is a graceful tree of a slender pyramidal habit, branching and leafy to the base, and of a bright and shining green. Between the two forms come transitions, described by Kirk, as "like a silver fir below and a Cyprus above (21, p. 191b Evidently there is here no relation in these forms to the environment, both stages are hereditary, the juvenile persisting for a definite period just as in the case of other dimorphic plants, but with different leaf-characters— e.g., Pseudopuiiax crOSSlfolium, Pcnnantia vorymbosa, Ac. Possibly in the case of D. Kirkii a fixed juvenile race could be produced from cuttings, and an admirable garden-plant lie so raised. PART IV.—HISTORY OF THE VEGETATION. A. FLORISTIC DETAILS. The Waipoua Forest Reserve contains, so far as my observations went, 241 species of floweringplants, ferns, and fern-allies, 178 belonging to the first-named, and 63 to the two latter categories taken together. Of these plants, 27 are found only in the Northern Floristic Province or just beyond its bounds, 213 belong to the Central Province also, while 159 extend to the Southern Province, and 02 arc also to be found in the New Zealand subantarctic islands or the Chatham Islands. As for the distribution of the plants beyond New Zealand, GO are Australian, including in that term Tasinaniaii also, but of these 37 are tilices or lycopodiacese, and only one a true forestplant; 14 are South American, 10 Malayan, and 20 are Polynesian, while no fexver than 154— /.»., 03 per cent. —are endemic. Of the non-endemic plants about SO may be considered tropical or subtropical, and at the same time the genera of many of the endemic species also belong to the same category. The above figures deal xvith both the forest and heath plants, but if the former alone lie considered, and the pteridophytes omitted, then out of a total of 127 forest plants, mostly trees and shrubs, no fewer than 120 are endemic. In other words, the kauri forest is strictly n production of New Zealand. B. CAUSES FOR PRESENT_DISTRIBUTION OF THE KAURI. Before we can consider the origin of a kauri forest such as the Waipoua, it is necessary to examine into the reasons for the presence north of latitude 38° of such a large number of species, or, in other words, the question arises, Why do not the kauri, the pohutukawa, the mangrove, and certain other well-known plants extend much further to the south than is the case? The answer which would at once suggest itself is that they are prevented doing so by the colder climate of the south. This answer, doubtless, is quite correct so far as certain of the endemic plants are concerned, but it certainly does not meet the case with regard to the kauri, Pittosporum crassi folium, Corokia buddleoides, Mt trosidtmt lomt nlosa. Persoonia torn, and other plants which are certainly quite hardy in the neighbourhood of Wellington and some of them even in Christchurch, one of the coldest places in winter at a low altitude in the whole biological area, not excluding the subantarctic islands. At the same time, in order to comprehend the matter more clearly, it is necessary to bear in mind the behaviour of certain southern plants which only reach a certain distance north, such as Veronica tlliptica, a most abundant coastal shrub from the Campbell Islands to a little north of Dunedin on the east, and a native also of Fuegia. It forms also thickets at the West Coast Sounds and finally is more or less abundant in north-west Nelson, and crossing Cook Strait appears again at Titahi Bay, Wellington. So. too, with Senecio ml unit'i foilus, xvhich does not extend quite so far to the north, and with the small coastal herb Crassula moschata, which extends from Macquarie Island to the northern shores of Cook Strait. In these instances it is no case of cold, but excess of heat that might be urged were it not for the fact that Veronica tlliptica and Senecio rotiintlifoliiis can both be cultivated with ease in the kauri region. Without going further into the matter here I may quote what 1 have already written on the subject in dealing with the dis tribution of New Zealand coastal plant (.">, pp. 325, 326, 327): — "It seems evident that extremes of climate is only one'of the factors with regard to the distribution of coastal plants in New Zealand. Rather, perhaps, than heat or cold alone is the matter one of the ecological optimum of any special plant. Many plants would extend farther to the north or the south, but they encounter competitors better equipped for the struggle -i.e.. more in liar mony xvith the surroundings than themselves. A plant which is slightly more suited than another for a particular station must evidently become the victor in the struggle for existence, although lwith outwardly may appear equally matched in every particular. The distribution of Sophora chathamica is an interesting case in point. Judging from the behaviour of the closely allied S. microphylla on the volcanic hills of Ranks Peninsula, where this plant is abundant, one would conclude ih.it similar hills on Chatham Island would be the habitat of S. chathamica. On the contrary, it is rpiite absent in such stations, lieing evidently not able to cope xvith the loxvland forestplants, and it is confined to a narroxv strip of limestone country near the margin of the great lagoon. In this place the difference of soil evidently equalises the struggle, and it and the other lowland forest trees there exist side by side. . . Finally, to sum up the matter, all that can be said about the distribution of the New Zealand coastal plants is that it is the resultant of a large number of causes. The historical factor and evolution determine the species, climate and soil sort them out into groups, and the struggle for existence, which is governed by the life-forms and constitutions of the competitors, finally fixes the formation—that is, so far as a formation may be termed a fixed entity." Now, the above explanation is not much of a one after all, and leaves the matter almost as at first. Rather perhaps does the history.of the land-surface, and with this the history of the vegetation, come to our aid. Here Ido not go into details ; they are to be found in the geological writings of Hutton and others, and are for the most part in the Transactions of the New Zealand Institute.

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert