&.—2i

Session 11. 1906. NEW ZEALAND.

WEST COAST SETTLEMENT RESERVES (REPORT OF ROYAL COMMISSION ON COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE IN CONNECTION WITH ADMINISTRATION OF THE).

Laid upon the Table by Command of His Excellency.

To His Excellency the Governor. May it please Youe Excellency,— In pursuance and exercise of the powers conferred on me by Your Excellency's Commission dated the 6th day of August, 1906, whereby, after reciting that Kuini Wi Eangipupu andHeni te Ran, aboriginal Natives of New Zealand, have petitioned the Parliament of New Zealand for relief, alleging that they have suffered in consequence of certain acts of the Public Trustee in his administration of the lands included in Crown grants numbered 3952 and 5238, the lands described therein being reserves vested in the Public Trustee under "The West Coast Settlement Eeserves Act, 1892," and the petitioners having life interests in the rents derived therefrom, Your Excellency was pleased to appoint me to be a Commissioner for the purpose of making inquiry into the following matters and things, namely,— (1.) Whether the Public Trustee has charged the said Kuini Wi Eangipupu a greater amount by way of commission than is allowed by law; (2.) Whether the Public Trustee in dealing with the interests of the said Kuini Wi Eangipupu in Crown Grant No. 3952, or in any other lands in which she has interests, has done, or omitted to do, any act or thing which would justify any complaint by the said Kuini Wi Rangipupu against the Public Trustee; (3.) Whether the said Heni te Eau has any cause of complaint against the Public Trustee in connection with his actions in relation to her interests in Crown Grant No. 5238 ; (4.) Whether the Natives interested in the West Coast Settlement Eeserves should be relieved from payment of land-tax where their individual interests in small reserves are of less value than the exemption allowed by the Land and Income Assessment Acts, — I have the honour to report as follows: — 1. I opened the inquiry directed by the said Commission at Hawera, on Thursday, the 23rd day of August, 1906, and continued the same at intervals until Saturday, the Ist day of September,. 1906. 2. Mrs. E. S. Thompson (Kuini Wi Eangipupu) and Mrs. Jane Brown (Heni te Eau) appeared to conduct their respective cases, and Mr. T. W. Fisher appeared as agent for the Public Trustee. 3. No witnesses were called other than the parties interested. 4. As a result of the inquiry, I am of opinion that the first, second, and third questions must be answered in the negative. 5. Mrs. Brown admitted that she had no complaint to make against either the Public Trustee or his agent, Mr. Fisher. The gist of her grievance lay in the fact that the provisions of " The West Coast Settlement Eeserves Act, 1892," placed her interests under the control of the Public Trustee, while she considered herself competent to manage her own affairs. Mrs. Brown acquired her interest in the land described in the Crown Grant No. 5238 not as original grantee, but as successor to a deceased grantee, and it would not, in my opinion, be advisable to make any personal distinction in favour of a successor, however competent he or she may be, so long as the West Coast Settlement Eeserves remain vested in the Public Trustee. 6. Mrs. Thompson also acquired her interest in the land described in Crown Grant No. 3952 by succession to a deceased grantee, and thus, so far as her objection to being placed under the control of the Public Trustee is concerned, the inexpediency of making personal distinctions applies also to her case. 7. I can find no evidence that the Public Trustee has charged more by way of commission than allowed by law, or that he has done or omitted to do anything that would justify a complaint against him.