Page image
Page image

A.—No. 1.

DESPATCHES EROM THE GOVERNOR OE NEW

62

from " all the world " to suppress the rebellion, and that army was recalled, either because they could not do the work, or because England found out that the work to be done was not " tiki" (not right)—that is, the Colonists had involved Britain in an unrighteous war; and their conclusions now arc that we are left to ourselves, that the rebels will now take advantage of our deserted and unprotected state, that they will seek " utu " (payment, revenge) for all the past ; and as we failed to conquer them when we had ten thousand soldiers, and all their big guns in the land, we have now no chance whatever, and of course they consider what will become of them, and ask themselves the question, what is the wisest course ? If they by fidelity to us assist a failing cause, how will they stand when we fall ? And they are confirmed in these views and apprehensions by tho fact that the few soldiers that remain here do not help the settlers at all, but are just spending their time amongst us like gentlemen. And if our own Pakeha soldiers do not help us, why should they be expected to do so ? Can we gainsay this reasoning of the Maori mind among our friendly Natives ? I confess I do not see how, and I fear if they were required by necessity to be put to the test, they would say, " Tour own soldiers do not fight for you, why should we ?" And then, regarding our cause as having been deserted by the Mother Country because it was an unrighteous one, their next step would be to go over at once to the rebels, regarding might as right, and right as safety. The Abyssinian expedition furnishes them with a remarkable contrast in confirmation of the views stated above. In that country there were less than a hundred Europeans in captivity—here there are many thousands of men, women, and children, as they think, at the mercy of the rebels, who can any day at their pleasure do as they have done before —shoot down, tomahawk, and carry off those who, in their daily avocations, dreamt not of a foe being near. To Abyssinia a mighty army of men and horses and elephants, with all its appliances, was sent to rescue the few —from this country tho army was taken away, leaving the many to their fate, which in many instances already has been a terrible one, as widows, fatherless children, and bereaved friends painfully testify. In Abyssinia the work was completed, the captives were released, the enemy was subdued, and the author of all the evil was slain : in New Zealand the case was the reverse —the army was withdrawn, the rebellion was not suppressed, the thousands were left to their fate, and the instigators of the mischief were left at large. In that country the few Pakehas were sojourners iu captivity, but not expending money in making a home for themselves and their children after them ; while here the thousands who have left their English homes to come to New Zealand have spent their all in expensive, continuous, and laborious efforts to fulfil God's original command to subdue the earth and possess, and have been again and again driven from homes which they had made for themselves, and which they hoped would be their children's homes, and the homos of their children's children. For the Abyssinian expedition the British nation laudably and cheerfully contributed some £6,000,000 without grumbling or requiring one sixpence in return from those for whose sake this expensive expedition was undertaken ; whereas the army was withdrawn from New Zealand before it had done its work ; a debt of £3,000,000 is thrown upon the Colony as the expenses of that army ; the country is burdened with that debt, as with a heavy millstone about its neck ; and every inhabitant ofthe land is taxed with the additional liability, over and above all other demands upon his strength and energy, of having to provide for the interest of this debt of £3,000,000. And now let me ask —Is the Maori view of the case the correct one ? Correct or not, it is the view by which the Natives are influenced, and by which their conduct is likely to be regulated. When I think of tho deliverance of the Abyssinian captives, and of the emancipation of the West Indian slaves at a cost of twenty millions, and when I talk of these things with our friendly Natives, I glory in my nation and thank God that I belong to such a people; but when I think of New Zealand, lam humbled indeed. Much, I know, has been said on the other side in opposition to the view given above as being that of the friendly Maoris. It may be said that our New Zealand Parliament requested that the troops might be withdrawn. But why was such a request made ? Several reasons may be mentioned. It was insinuated that the war was begun or w ras being continued for the gratifying of the ambition and avarice of the Colonists, and this insinuation being extensively entertained by the army, the effect was manifest, in comparative inactivity. The Colonists were given to understand that tfie expenses of the war would fall upon them, and our Government rightly considered that the expensiveness of such comparative inactivity should not be continued. The hope was entertained that the rebellious Natives had been led to see their mistake, and that when the way was opened for their return to friendship by the removal of the soldiers from the country, they would avail themselves of the opportunity. It was like the laying down of arms on our part, and an invitation for them to follow our example. Asa Colony wo felt that we could not afford to pay for an expensive and comparatively inactive army, and we hoped to be able to do without it. And it maybe said that the thousands of brave men in New Zealand who bear the British name ought to be able to cope with the few Natives who are in rebellion against us. True ; but then how are they to cultivate their farms and keep the field against the foe at the same time ? How are they to pay off the debt of £3,000,000, or even the interest thereof, if their time and energies are to be exhausted in an expensive and protracted warfare ? The friendly Natives never approved of the withdrawal of the troops until matters should bo thoroughly settled, and it is now with them a very serious question what will be done, and how will they be affected ? Some three or four months ago the friendly Natives of this district visited the rebel tribes in the south with the hope of promoting and establishing peace. This gave those tribes an opportunity of returning the visit, and they came by hundreds. But they came, not as those who are vanquished and humbled, but as those whose right it is to dictate terms and lay down the law. Of course they came without arms, and were received with every manifestation of friendly feeling and hospitality, both by Natives and Europeans. But to the appeal made to them by the authorities in the way of assertion and example, " War is at an end, is it not ? " and which was responded to in Native fashion by a loud and unanimous " Ae " from the Pakehas, they made a very equivocal and unsatisfactory response, and since their return war has recommenced in a most savage and murderous way by them or their friends. The impression is therefore irresistible that they came here for the purpose of spying out our weakness, and also of getting the friendly Natives over to their side. Out of deference to those by whom they were entertained they allowed us to hold our religious services in their presence, and to preach to them

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert