EDUCATION: GRADING OF TEACHERS. READJUSTMENTS FOR FEARS 1917, 1918, AND 1919 (RETURN SHOWING).

Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1919 Session I, E-01a

E.—lA

1919. NEW ZEALAND.

EDUCATION: GRADING OF TEACHERS. READJUSTMENTS FOR FEARS 1917, 1918, AND 1919 (RETURN SHOWING).

Return to an Order of the House of Representatives dated the 20lh September, 1919. Ordered, " That there be laid before this House a return showing separately for thc!educationfyears[l9l7, 1918. and 1919 —(1) The number of education districts (giving names) in which the Assistant Director of Education returned for readjustment to the Inspectors the completed graded lists of teachers; (2) the particular groups in each district which were degraded as a result of the Assistant Director's action ; (3) the number of teachers in each district who appealed against their grading; and (4) the number of instances in which the Appeal Board restored to tho affected groups marks lost by the action of the Assistant Director."—(Mr. Young.)

Return.

(1) (3) (4) (2) ~ District. Adjustments made in . . . . , ... A . ,. . , Appeals lodged. AdlUi Groups indicated. ' ' i 1917. 1918. | 1919. 1917. 1918. 1.919. [ 1917. itoration of ited Marks by peal Board. And General Notes as given below. 1918. 1919. 1917. 1918. . 1919. I Auckland Taranaki Wanganui Hawke's Bay.. Wellington Nelson Canterbury . . I Otago Southland 4 3 i Nil 41 91 51 15 5 4 6 5 6 3 Nil Nil \ 8 4 9 1 Nil I Nil 10 12 3 2 1 Nil ; Nil 8 26 10 2 3 1 Nil j Nil 18 38 20 3 4 1 Nil Nil 3 10 8 2 3 1 1 ; Nil 37 23 22 3 2 6 2 Nil Nil 13 30 14 3 4 5 1 Nil Nil 4 7 4 2 3 4 49 1(a) l(w) 4(a) 2(a) 4(a) Mb) .. 1(c) .. [(d) .. He) 1(./) 1(9) m 1(h) .. m Nil Nil 7 4 m .. m I I 9 2 .. 142 241 141 15 2 142 3(a) 241 3(a) 141 3(a) 15 4(a) 49 4(6) , l(X') .. 1(/,') 1 ' i

E.—la

2

Notes in connection with Return. 1917. Auckland. — I (a). During their grading and before their report was completed the Inspectors bad graded the whole of group 4, and a few teachers in 5 and 6, lower than in 1916, when the grading was obviously 100 high. 2 (a). The Department did not degrade these groups, but effected an all-round raising of marks in group 4, since the new lower grading—see 1 (a) —had proved to be too low —see 1 (If). 4 (a). The Appeal Board allowed the appeals of fifteen teachers. The Department. and not the Appeal Board, granted an all-round increase to non-appellants in order to preserve uniformity. This inore_ase subsequently proved to be too great. Taranaki. —1 (&). As the marking was somewhat below standard, pari of group 3 was raised. Wanganui. —l (c). Nine teachers in groups 1 and 2 were raised. Hawke's Bay. —l (d). Part of groups 1 and 2 were raised. Wellington. —l (c). Part of group •'! raised, and a few teachers in groups 1 and 2. Nelson. — 1 (/). Groups 1, 2, and ."> all raised. Canterbury. — 1 (g). Group 1 was raised, and a few teachers in groups 3 and 6. Otago. —l (h). Groups •'! and 4 were all raised, and some teachers in groups 2 and 5. Southland. —1 (j). Groups 1, 2, and 3 raised, and a few in group 4. General. —1 (k). The raising of various groups in all the other districts was the cause of the raising of Auckland Group 4. 1918. Auckland. —l (in). This adjustment was made by the Inspectors on the return of their lists and the receipt of information from the Department. 4 (a). The recommendation of the Appeal Board was almost an impossible one to carry out. When this recommendation was forwarded to the Inspectors by the Department they reported as.follows : " Thai the Auckland grading officers feel tliat they cannot restore the marks of the teachers recommended for restoration unless the marks of those teachers who were also reduced but who did not appeal are also restored; and, further, the Auckland grading officers feel that if all the teachers thus affected are restored then the original disparity between the average level of Auckland and the rest of the Dominion remains." General. — 3 (a). Included in these totals are letters which were subsequently ruled out of order as appeals. W. J. Anderson, Director of Education. Education Department, Wellington, 13th October, 1919.

Approximate Cost of Paper. —Preparation, not given ; printing (7- r )0 copies), £2 ss.

Authority : Marcus F. Marks, Government Printer, Wellington.—l9l9.

Price 3d.]