Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SOME INJUSTICE

RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE APPEAL BOARD TREATMENT METHODIST MINISTER’S CLAIM / AUCKLAND, Thursday Referring to conscientious objectors at the annual synod of the Auckland District of the Methodist Church yesterday, the chairman, the Rev. F. Copeland, said he disagreed with the views of those who thought it their duty to refuse any kind of assistance to their country. “My unequivocal position,” he said, “ enables me to speak all the more freely. When I express the difficulty I have in understanding the grounds upon which the conscientious genuineness or otherwise of those appearing before the various appeal boards is determined. In some cases, I consider that, to put it quite moderately, very much less than justice had been done, one result being to create serious doubts in the minds of some people whether we are not, in practice, repudiating some of the democratic rights for which we claim to be sacrificing our manhood.

“ I consider it a matter for regret, however, that no form of alternative service has been devised save by means of the defaulters’ detention camps. If no other method of using this section of our manpower can be devised, then I suggest that some other designation should be used. A stigma attaches to the term defaulter that ought not to rest upon some of the men, at least, who will be inmates of these camps.”

CHRISTCHURCH OPINIONS (By Telegrapn.—Press Association) CHRISTCHURCH, Wednesday The opinion that some conscientious objectors “ of undoubted sincerity ” had had their appeals dismissed by appeal boards and that a higher tribunal should be set up to give a rehearing in such cases was expressed in a motion passed by the North Canterbury District Methodist Synod. Some of the clergy stron&ly criticised some decisions by appeal boards. Other members contended that the Church was not justified in questioning the actions of a judicial tribunal. MINISTERS’ INDISCRETIONS (By Telegrapn.—Press Association) DUNEDIN, Wednesday The following resolution was passed tonight by the Methodist Synod of Otago and Southland: “ That the synod views with concern the continued indiscretions committed by some ministers and leaders of our Church while attending military appeal boards. It believes that the general public regards such acts as indicative of the official attitude of our Church in the present national crisis. It therefore calls on the conference to enforce such discipline, or if necessary to draft and enact such legislation, as will prevent future misrepresentation.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19411120.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 129, Issue 21583, 20 November 1941, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
399

SOME INJUSTICE Waikato Times, Volume 129, Issue 21583, 20 November 1941, Page 4

SOME INJUSTICE Waikato Times, Volume 129, Issue 21583, 20 November 1941, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert