Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PUBLIC OPINION

As expressed by correspondents whose letters are welcome, but for whose views we have no responsibility. Correspondents are requested to write in ink. It is essential that anonymous writers enclose their proper names as a guarantee of good faith. Unless this rule is complied with, their letters will not appear.

RESPONSIBILITY OF UNIONISTS

| (To the Editor.) Sir, —“ A Real Worker ” has carefully omitted answers to any of my points. lam not complaining of any man receiving £SOO or £IOOO a year. ' I am merely showing that it is both unfair and illogical to criticise one ; section of the community for asking j £290 a year when other sections are I considered incapable of keeping body j and soul together on less than £SOO. i I would like to point out that any ; man’s “ ability to make a business | pay ” depends on his capacity either j to charge the consuming public more j than his goods cost, or to pay his em- ] ployees less in wages than they pro--1 duce in goods. I No matter how honest, fair, or geni erous a man may be (and I think i most men are so), he must, if he j wishes to retain his income, either ! take from the consuming public or his workers more than he gives in re- > turn. Further, incomes whether ; earned or unearned, tend to perpetuate themselves, irrespective of the . ability of individuals. For example, ; a “ trammie’s ” son will usually re- | ceive the same wage as his father, j while the son of a wealthy man will either fall into a very well-paid job or will inherit a large income. So far as “ loyalty to the firm that gives him his bread and butter ” is concerned, when an employer suspects that a worker is not returning more in labour than he is receiving in wages he must dismiss that worker, irrespective of “ loyalty.” This answers all the points raised by “ Pouri,” excepting the salaries of union officials and politicians. I j maintain that when an official or a j politician is paid more than the men | he represents, he tends to forget their i conditions, and sees through the eyes i of the income group to which he bej longs. I Dad and Dave have changed their j address to Waikato Gully. “ Pouri’s ’ j conscience told him, apparently, that to attack a man from behind a nom de plume was rather mean, and. that being so, Snake Gully was perhaps a little too apt.—l am. etc., G. A. CRABB. ! Frankton, September 5.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19400907.2.118

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 127, Issue 21212, 7 September 1940, Page 12

Word count
Tapeke kupu
425

PUBLIC OPINION Waikato Times, Volume 127, Issue 21212, 7 September 1940, Page 12

PUBLIC OPINION Waikato Times, Volume 127, Issue 21212, 7 September 1940, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert