Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SAVING OF CREW

SHELLS NEARER AND NEARER GALLANT BRITISH AIRMEN SEQUEL TO SUBMARINE ATTACK (United Press Assn.—Elec. Tel. Copyright) (Received Sept. 23, 3.15 p.m.) LONDON, Sept. 22 Captain J. Schofield, master of the Kensington Court, the crew of which were rescued by British airmen, said a submarine, without warning, shelled the vessel, which was bound for Birkenhead with Argentina wheat. He sighted the submarine, ordered full steam ahead, and sent out an "5.0.5." The submarine continued firing shells, continued the captain. "Each came nearer and near until I decided I must save the crew, so I ordered the boats to he lowered. Shells fell close on either side of the ship as we were abandoning her. "IHnlf-an-hour later we saw the planes. We did not dream that they would come down, and we were astonished and delighted when we saw’ two alight. The crew were ferried tw’o or three at a time to the flyingboats in the latters’ emergency rubber dinghies.’’ TRADE AGREEMENTS THE POSITION OF NEUTRALS WARNINGS BY GERMANY BRITAIN DENIES BREACH (Official Wireless) (Received Sept. 25, 3.15 p.m.) RUGBY, Sept. 22 The validity of the reported warnings by Germany that neutrals would be giuilty of a breach of neutrality in making war trade agreements with Britain which resulted in limiting exports to Germany and of overseas goods allowed transit through their territory to Germany is not admitted by authorities on international law in London. They point out that neutrals might counter the German claim by replying that by reason of its sea-power Britain could and would enforce the agreement that goods in transit shall not reach Germany. Thus, in order to assure her own supplies, such agreement must be made by a neutral in her own interests and is, in fact, made for no other reason than to benefit herself. War trade agreements limiting exports to Germany could be justified by a neutral by reference to her own needs, especially if she had already a system of export restriction licensing, but the technical answer to Germany in this regard is that there is no breach of neutrality in making an agreement with one belligerent if the neutral does not refuse to discuss and if practicable enter into an agreement with the other belligerent. Germany in the last war no doubt had many agreements with neutrals who also had agreements with Britain.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19390923.2.61

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 125, Issue 20917, 23 September 1939, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
393

SAVING OF CREW Waikato Times, Volume 125, Issue 20917, 23 September 1939, Page 8

SAVING OF CREW Waikato Times, Volume 125, Issue 20917, 23 September 1939, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert