Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRISK DEBATE

* non intervention police

SPANISH DELEGATE’S DEMANDS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY URGED United Press Assn.—Elec. Tel. Copyrtrni GENEVA, May 11 A fierce attack by Senor Delvayo on non-intervention was the chief topic at the League Council. Senor Delvayo again demanded that the Spanish Government should be free to buy war materiiiN. ‘ Let us end this sham," he declared. Foreign intervention had been intensified in recent months. Italy had flagrantly violated her promise to Britain by the despatch of reinforcements du.'ing the progress of negotiations resulting in the Anglollalian igreement. The Spanish Government invited the League Commission to Spain to invest gate. Viscount Halifax reiterated Britain's reasons for adherence to non-inter-vention, and argued that though breaches occurred on both sides the policy had been at lokst partially successful. Viscount Halifax believed the Anglo-Italian, and Italian-French ending of foreign participation, and stressed the League s qualifications for acting as the organ of conciliation. M. Bonnet (France), said the French Government was convinced that nonintervention was the only policy conforming to the interests of European peace and the ultimate benefit of the Spanish nation. Mr Jordan’s Stand Mr W. J. Jordan announced that he fully supported Senor Delvayo*s argument. The least that could be done was to accept the invitation to send a commission of inquiry to Spain. "Senor Delvayo’s plea is so amazingly moderate that we cannot hesitate to comply." He urged that a new ef- „ fort should be made to allow the Spanish people to decide its own destiny “by the use of different methods than we arc now using.” M- Litvinoff (Russia., said the Soviet also shared Senor Delvayo’s agreements would contribute to the views. M. Munters Latvia), who presided. v proposed to close the discussion, but Senor Delvayo claimed the right of reply, whereon M. Munters said he would consult his colleagues on future procedure. The council then adjourned.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19380513.2.111

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 122, Issue 20497, 13 May 1938, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
310

BRISK DEBATE Waikato Times, Volume 122, Issue 20497, 13 May 1938, Page 9

BRISK DEBATE Waikato Times, Volume 122, Issue 20497, 13 May 1938, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert