Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROTECTIVE TARIFFS.

(To the Editor.) Sir,—Once again the Prime Minister t has made an emphatic statement that " local industries must be protected from unfair competition, in response to the 1 j manufacturers’ complaints that their 3 1 products are being driven off the local : : market as a result of increased costs. I Mr Savage’s response was that “the y Government’s policy for expansion of ? , manufacturing in New Zealand would II j include protection IT local industries I from unfair conn * ! ‘ n from imports.” 6 That, of course, mean only one * j thing under orthodox finance —another j increase, in costs, for it would be quite impossible for the Government lo give f Mi is protection by going back on its . j iiiduslrial legislation. } ! Nor must il be ITgollon that the ; : Minister of Finance. Mr Nash, lias been p | stressing llu: necessity for Iwo-way i trade, and to place any restrictions on | imports must mililale against future ~ j agreements willi Hie Empire countries. The big quest ion K how serious is t lie flood of imports that are supposed lo be dealing a death-blow at. our local industries? The sterling credits, s which arc tlie financial source of ims ports, have not fallen •substantially g from what they were. So far we have e only heard the news from the inters ested parlies, the Manufacturers’ 3, Association and tho Government; and, 1- indeed, it will probably lie some time .3 i before the position is properly eluri:r j fled, as it. is of such recent growth. I and the demand for many commodities c, I varies with Ihe season of the year. Kil If the flood of imports, lot in as a >s result, of tlie increases of eosls, is 5, sufficient lo cause a set -back lo indus- »- try as a whole-—which I very much doubt—lhe Labour Government must fall, for rmpioynienl is far more dear to Hie worker Ilian tho forly-lmur week: a .mb at longer hours is heller _ Hum no job at all. I’rolerlion can only lie given through |r * j Increasing Ihe cost of living: I Imre also '^ l j nian - and any nllempl ~ 1 lo sinner credit lie adopted. , | Gerl ain I > Ihe Industrial Kllirien.w '_|Arl, willi its provision lor licensing "j I control and price fixation al a heavs 'j cost in individual lil.erly and I In' I grnwlh of luir.-aiicr.iey. promised in;>y ! tliis has apparently md -atMli'd lora ,, r | all | ! n • .S IIN'IU- ... V i! .’id*- 111 . 1 \ I •! IT.M'i .N I . >L! etc. * ' 13,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19370820.2.100.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20277, 20 August 1937, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
421

PROTECTIVE TARIFFS. Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20277, 20 August 1937, Page 9

PROTECTIVE TARIFFS. Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20277, 20 August 1937, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert