Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRIBUTE TO MR NASH

“COURAGE AND SAGACITY.” SALE OF DAIRY PRODUCE. IMPROVED MARKETING SYSTEM. ® The Minister of Finance and of Marj keting, the Hon. Walter Nash, was to 1 1 be congratulated for his courage and ' sagacity in adopting a proved plan for ’•supervision ajid control of the sale of j dairy produce throughout Great ~j Britain, stated Mr W. Goodfellow, 1 j chairman of Amalgamated Dairies, Limited, and advisory director of the New Zealand Co-operative Dairy Com- ! pany, when speaking at the smoke L i concert of dairy company committee--men in Hamilton last evening. This '• action had already increased marketm ing efficiency and had eliminated many ” 5 of the objectionable weaknesses of the old system, considered Mr Goodc follow. Tiie change had been brought about without friction or hardship. L Mr Goodfellow reviewed the efforts r made since January, 1922, by the - New Zealand Dairy Company, the •f! Dairy Control Board and Amalgamated n j Dairies, to bring about improved mars j keting in the United Kingdom. Tt o had, he stated, remained for the pren sent Government to succeed where - others had failed in this objective. -1 He pointed out, however, that bulk purchase was not essential to efllci- - ent marketing. Imposition of Levy. n . Referring to the statement pub--5 . lished in the press on August 16, regarding tiie possible imposition of a ° I imported into the United Kingdom , j fell below 100 s and 56s respectively. [ s i Mr Goodfellow' said that the question 3 1 of a levy would thus be postponed 8 | for three or four months, but if the •■[original 10 per cent import duty were n j imposed, the cost to the producers e and the country generally would be £2,000.000 per annum. He pointed out that three years ago the British Government would have welcomed a bi-lateral agreement with New Zeals landjj Quite recently Canada had suciQ ceeded in negotiating an agreement, Q but had found it necessary to make )t substantial tariff reduction's in favc our of British goods; nevertheless, she had secured an agreement where-' by very substantial quantities of hams, bacon, wheat, limber and other commodities would lie admitted to tiie j United Kingdom market. He bad no [ coubt tli at Mr Nash had done his uter I most to secure for New Zealand a j j trade agreement, but the matter was l -|of such vital importance fo the dairv 6 farmers that he felt justified in ask--31 inb why Mr Nash haid failed when 1 Canada had succeeded? dj It was true, possibly, that the time l was not opportune, the European e situation was extremely difficult and n | dangerous, and that (he British Govs i eminent were in consequence most “! anxious to retain the friendship of Hie L | United States. Further, an effort was nj being made to re-establish inlernas [ tional trade to provide increasing e.\l.j port business after Ihe armament programme had been completed. An e examination of New Zealand's trade - would probably furnish part of (he e j answer. During 1936 New Zealand d had an adverse trade balance with d Australia, Canada and the United -[States, amounting to £7,500,000. e o 1 Dominion’s Purchases. f] According to ilic 'Board of Trade, J l l New Zealand purchased British goods ( ; I to the value of £17.000,000, and sold goods lo the United Kingdom to Ihe value of £43,000,000, continued Mr Goodfellow. Australian manufacturers had Hie advantage of exchange L parity with New Zealand, whereas Hie British manufacturer was penalised to the extent of 25 per cent. n I Further, Australia had kept, down d; costs, and was now in a position to i undersell ihe New Zealand manufacd | tiircr—resulting in shiploads of goods s j coming into New Zealand, the bulk ot .i'which could have been diverted to the v United Kingdom. _j These tilings, said Mr Goodfellow, ’ Bill not 1 'iiss unnoticed l. y n 3O nritv j ish manufacturer, t The Federation of British Industries _ was a very live body, and worked r ; closely \vith ilic Brilisli c.nvemment . i ui rep,ml lo oil Ir.olo m.,!!,■••.. Ma ! lionillYllnxv pointed out, furilicr, tli.it | \ustrali;t, i; wool , 00l the 1 nil.nl t stf,lf Y W in red lily New Xe.-ilnnd's f "'ii™ eompolilors in the British niarhot: also Hint Now Zealand was in a I ' ory area I, posit lon coni pa red wi! h () i any olhor daily produce export conn- „ 1 1 '■"Old eontoiniplinn nr farm pm- , i duels in New Zealand ano. lulled |o I rally Id lo ir, per cent ; whereas in N'lulr.ili.i ho p.-r cent ami in i oiad i -ii ~ j per rent of lire produce was consumed !in Ihe rnuntry. These fiaores snre!v ' emphasise' Ihe M eeiN n| |,ee| - , I hira down eosls and dome reonihimr ■ 111 New Zealand's power In diwelnp reciprocal Ira do. wild its nolv Chi customer. Din I'nihal Kinwhon,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19370819.2.79

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20276, 19 August 1937, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
815

TRIBUTE TO MR NASH Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20276, 19 August 1937, Page 10

TRIBUTE TO MR NASH Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20276, 19 August 1937, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert