Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“NO CONFIDENCE”

CHAIRMAN REBUKED.

BREEZE AT BOARD MEETING. ALLEGED BROKEN PROMISE. (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) CHRISTCHURCH, Wednesday. The unusual spectacle of a member proposing and then putting to the meeting a motion of no-confldence in the chairman was witnessed at today's meeting of the Canterbury Education Roard. Strong criticism was levelled at the chairman, Mr. .T. E. Preen, for his decision to retain office for a second period of 12 months but Mr. Preen refused to change his mind. Discussion was at times heated, three members, Messrs. C. S. Thompson, C». W. Armitage and W. A. Banks contending that when Mr. Preen took office 12 months ago he gave an undertaking to submit his name to ballot if lie decided to seek re-election. Under the Act the chairman was elected for two years. After calling the meeting to order Mr. Preen called for nominations for the appointments committee. Mr. Thompson moved that the secretary take the chair and that the election of the chairman be proceeded with. “ * hold that llie motion is out of order,” said the chairman, Mr. Thompson, moved that tlie chairman's ruling he disagreed with. “ An Absurd Point.” “ It’s an absurd point,” Mr. Preen observed. “ The chairman is elected j to hold office for two years, it is his prerogative lo decide whether he will retire at the end of 12 months or whether he retains office. In this case I am not going to retire.” “ i am sorry that the chairman of the board has broken his promise,” said Mr. W. A. Banks. ” I think you have the law on your side but on the other side perhaps It is better not io say anything. Mr. Thompson: “I move a vote of no-confldence in the chairman. I also understood he gave that promise.” The motion of no-confldence was seconded by Mr. Armitage. ” I cannot take the motion and I rule it out of order,” said Mr, Preen. There was a dramatic moment when Mr. Thompson rose and put the motion of no-confldence. ” All in favour?” he asked. ” Aye,” said Mr. Armitage. ” The only thing lhat has happened Is that i have changed my mind and some of you know why,” remarked Mr. I Preen. “ I don’t want to have anything to do with a man who breaks his word,” said Mr. Thompson a little later. Mr. Armitage: I am in the same position. The board proceeded to appoint

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19370818.2.78

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20275, 18 August 1937, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
401

“NO CONFIDENCE” Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20275, 18 August 1937, Page 8

“NO CONFIDENCE” Waikato Times, Volume 121, Issue 20275, 18 August 1937, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert