THE PANAMA CANAL.
[Br EMiCTRIO TELKGRAI'H,—COPYRIGHT.] Paris, January 19, In the case against the Panama Canol • directors, the Public Prosecutor made >p
severe strictures on the conduct of M. Eiffel, and demanded that all the fendants should be imprisoned without the option of a fine, contending that the infliction of a fine would not be sufficient punishment for sale swindling as had been perpetrated by the accused, A bank clerk informed the Panama Canal Inquiry Committee that the lists supplied by Reinach and Clemenceau of members of the Chamber of Deputies who had bee.i bribed woro similar, but Clemcnceau added to his that three hundred cheques, involving persons bribed by Artois, had been discovered in a bank,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18930121.2.28
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XL, Issue 3210, 21 January 1893, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
117THE PANAMA CANAL. Waikato Times, Volume XL, Issue 3210, 21 January 1893, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in