JUSTICE V. J. OKER AND THE SINGLE TAX LAND NATIONALISATION FAD.
TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —"Justice "iii to-day's issue defies J. Oker to produce a square rood of land, and therefore argues that he has no right to it, although he has bought it and paid for it, and proves his point (to his own satisfaction) by his horso theory. But does "Justice " mean to say that he or any other manor woman has ever produced a horse— an ass they may have for a son, but a horse never; therefore a man has no more right to a horse than he has to a rood of land, a von though he may have bought it and paid for if.. —Yours truly, Ox. Waikato, 21th Xov., ISSJI.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18911128.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 3023, 28 November 1891, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
127JUSTICE V. J. OKER AND THE SINGLE TAX LAND NATIONALISATION FAD. Waikato Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 3023, 28 November 1891, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in