A DENIAL.

Waikato Times, Volume XXXVII, Issue 3000, 6 October 1891, Page 2

A DENIAL.

I TO J'HK ICIUTOK. Sin, —Mr Murray, in his election addressee appears to have made, frequent reference to myself by way of complaint that I should have expressed myself unfavourable to his candidature. The reason given for his displeasure seouis to be that it was owing to his good offices ihat 1 became a Minister of the Crown in 1870. Now, my recollection of the circumstances which led to my acceptance of office at that time is particularly vivid, and I am prepared to say that the actual circumstances as they occurred were entirely inconsistent with Mr Murray's recollection of them, that is, if 1 may judge from the published reports of tha; gentleman's election speeches. In any case, however, my part in the present election contest i.s perfectly plain. 1 recognise to the fullest extent the claims which this district has upon me for any service I can reuder. 1 happen to be in a position which particularly qualities me for forming an opinion as to the comparative fitness of the two candidates in the present contest for the position to which they aspire. Surely my highest duty requires me to give my late constituents the benefit of the matured opinion I have formed. I have declared to the best of my knowledge and belief thai of the two candidates in the field Mr Lake is far and away the best man. In doing so I have simply done what I conceived to be my duty, and Mr Murray ought not to be angry with rr.e. The value which ought to be attached to the opinion I have expressed is a matter entirely for the electors to determine. Upon that point I say nothing. I point out this, however, if the personal obligations between Mr Murray and myself really existed (which they do not), the personal matter would have to be superseded by the higher duty 1 owe to my lata constituents, and in that case it seems to me that the value of my opinion would be greatly enhanced. Let me add one word more. Mr Murray has so managed his candidature as to secure the. support of tin) most advanced section of the d'overniiient supporters in this district. Surely it is :i little bit unreasonable that he should expect the support also of the late leader of the Opposition or any of his friends. Let me say, in conclusion, that I have uo quarrel with Mr Murray, and seek none. I can only regret that he should try to fasten a quarrel on me by constant references to myself in his speeches, which are neither justified by facts nor supported by argument.—Yours, &c, .Tohn Buvcf.