POLICE COURT, HAMILTON.

Waikato Times, Volume XXXVI, Issue 2903, 21 February 1891, Page 2

POLICE COURT, HAMILTON.

Vk«tkhiiav—(Before Capt, J-ick-mii, K.M., ;ind Me-srH lviu« and P.imr.ise, J. IV) Li: <jn-:ssK v. Kim.dkr.—Mr L, O'Xeill appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Swarbrick, on behalf of Mr Hay, for the defendant. This was a claim ot i.'S, for damage to a buggy ami horse and harness. .7udsrnifiiit, which was reserved from hist court day, was given for defendant, with co-its l'l 9.5. Tavi.ou v. SoMiißMa.-Mr L. o.S'eill appeared for defendant. Judgment in this case, a claim of t'l for a cowl, which was reserved from last e •urt dav, was given for defendant, with costs L"i 17- lid. BUKH'UOK BY-LAWS,—Wiremil Matiwha was charged by Constable Murray, with a breach of the Hamilton Borough Council by-laws, by riding over the Ifamillon tr.ilUe budge, at other than a walking pace, on the 7th inst. .Defendant pleaded not guilty, and said tho pace was a fast walk. Constable Murray and Wild proved the offence, defend.i-d. who wis n-.t sobei, having cantered the whole length of the bridge from the K-.sr end to tho West end. A tine ■•f :n was imposed, the costs bring remitted, and defendant was instructed to tell all the • nalives that they are not allowed to cross at other than a walking pace.—-James Marker was charged with riding a bicycle' along the footpath of V'ictoria-.-creet. Defendant pleaded guilty, and a tine of Is, with cos!s7s, was imposed. —William Wood was charged with wheeling a wheelbai row, on the lSth insl.. on the footpath of Vic-toria-street, I'ri.son-T (ilc-.-ul.d 110 L guilty. Consti.'ole Wild and H. i.v.ick proved the oll'enee. Defendant gave evidence as to the reason of his being on tho footpath. A line of t!d, without costs, was imposed. JJkkaui of K.wi.way I>y-La\\s.—Fiede-riek Hunt was charged with trespassing with a liorso, on the railway line, near Krankton, on January l!)th., to which the public are not allowed. I fefendant pleaded guilty, and was tilled 10 : , and costs, Is. IIr.MXKV V. Hoi'A.—Oiaim, £2 2s fid. Defendant admitted the claim, and judgment was given for piaintdF. wall costs los.