Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AMERICAN TARIFF.

It begins to be very apparent that the actual proposals in regard to lopping off excrescences from the tariff are not going to be very revolutionary or even important from free trade and protectionist points of view. And that is exactly what was to be expected from the first. There was not in 18S4, and there is not now, any substantial difference between the two great political parties in regard to the protective essence of a revenue tariff. The Democrats declared in their last national platform for a tariff that should raise no more revenue than was required for the purpose of the government, economically administered ; at the same time they were careful to say that as much protection to home industry should be got out of such a tariff as was possible to extract from it. The Republicans, at the same time, declared for a tariff sufficient to meet the requirements of the National Government, and that it should be prepared with special regard to the just claims of American labour. The two platforms were so much alike that it was impossible "to tell the 'tother from which." It was a case of six of one and half a dozen of the other. It will be the same similarity to the end. There are revenue reformers in both parties, and also strong and unqualified protectionists in each. The whole situation can be stated within the narrowest space. The existing tariff, which has come, to us from war- times, has survived a remarkable iucrease of population, and is now yielding more revenue than the Government can legitimately spend or either party justify. There would have to be a reduction, whichever party was iu power. In reducing or taking off protective duties, some interest or other is bound to think itself hurt, and to squeal accordingly. It happens that the Democrats, being in oflice, are responsible for initiating legislation, against them will be directed the opposition of the interests that may feel aggrieved. The same thing would happen to the Republicans if they were in power. The outs always have the advantage of the ins in regard to such matters. It is ever easier to stand still and do nothing than to fashion, originate, and build up. In the coming contest in Congress over the tariff, there will bo much posing for position and jockeying for advantages, but in like circumstances both parties would do pretty much the same thing. There is about as much protection and as little free trade in one as in the other. All pretences to the contrary arc notisence and humbug intended for political effect.—San Francisco News Letter.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18880403.2.31

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XXX, Issue 2454, 3 April 1888, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
444

AMERICAN TARIFF. Waikato Times, Volume XXX, Issue 2454, 3 April 1888, Page 2

AMERICAN TARIFF. Waikato Times, Volume XXX, Issue 2454, 3 April 1888, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert