RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, ALEXANDRA. Friday.— (Before Mr H. W. Northcroft, R.M.)
If ill v. Gates.—Claim for (foods, £115s Id. No appearance of defendant. Judgment for plaintiff with costs, £1 ()*, T. Hughks v. Paha Komanga.—Judgment summons for £7 12s Gd. No appearance of defendant. James Thompson was sworn as intetpreter. T. Hughe*, sworn, deposed that he had not been paid the amount as adjudged^by the Court. He had heard that defendant had sold cattle, and also received money from the railway contractor, Mr Coates, since the judgment was given against him, and that he could have paid if he had a mind. —By Court: Did not see cattle sold or know of your own knowledge defendant had received the money ; He had been told so.—Court: That is not evidence, you must produce evidencothatdefendant had means to satisfy the judgment. I will adjourn the case to enable you to summons witnesses until December 3rd. This was all the business.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18861012.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2225, 12 October 1886, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
157RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, ALEXANDRA. Friday.—(Before Mr H. W. Northcroft, R.M.) Waikato Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2225, 12 October 1886, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in