Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REMARKABLE MATRIMONIAL SUIT.

In the Divorce division, m-ently, Mr. Justice Butt 1> id before him the civ; of " Elmhirat v. Elinhirst."— The petition w.i« th il of thy wife for a decree of judicial separation hy re i«on of tho allt jrtd adultery of hor hush m.i, C i^t .uu Edw .ird iVnncli KlnihiiKt, Life of the oOlh reir iment, with Mi>s Helen Livingstone — He filed an answer denying th" charge, und pleaded Anicricui domic ilo, and tli.it he had obt unod a divorce in the United St itp» f i oni thi> p(tiiioii"i. The- petitioner was th» daughter ot Mr Kimi.iird, of 17 ( Kensington Pain' c-gardfii*. She married the respondent on the -2ud April, 1873. In tho hunting-field tVic i o-ponde&t met Miss In November 1883, one ot the servants m.ido a communication to Mrt EWnhirst, to the effent fh-it she had seen Ciptaiu Elmhtrst go into Mi«h Livingstone'/* room. When spoken to on tho subject the respondent denied it The petitioner, however, instated on Miss Liviugntone leaving the house. About ChrHtrnuH, 1883, when Mrs. Elnihirst wis in London, her hU^bpnd met with an accident in the hunting field, aud he was taken to the hniise of Miss Livingstone, who attunded him Upon this routing to the petitlrtnci's knowledirc she wrote to her hu>band, but. ho replied that after her letter he would leave Rotherby. H<> afterwards went to America, and boiiffht a cattle rancbo at Montani. He was shortly afterwprds joined hy Mis 3 Liviujr^tone, and the next fcliinij iho pptition«*r beard of him was that he had obtained ajjiinst her an American divorce. — Mrs Elmhirst, the petitioner, in crossexamination, admitted that her hnsb.md always denied the charge with Miss Livinffhtone. Her objeut in askinsr fi>r a judicial heparation was to prove that sho was his legal wife — Mr Justice Butt thought the petitioner was entitled to the relict she prayed, and he granted a decree of judicial separation, with co^ts.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18860619.2.46

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2176, 19 June 1886, Page 2 (Supplement)

Word count
Tapeke kupu
323

REMARKABLE MATRIMONIAL SUIT. Waikato Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2176, 19 June 1886, Page 2 (Supplement)

REMARKABLE MATRIMONIAL SUIT. Waikato Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2176, 19 June 1886, Page 2 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert