A DIVORCE CASE. [BY TELEGRAPH.-OWN CORRESPONDENT.] Dunedin, Monday.
In the divorce case Wakofiold v. Wakeneld and Withers, there was no appearance of respondent or co-respondent. The evidence conclusively proved the full confession of both parties. A decree nisi was issued, petitioner to have custody of the children.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18860504.2.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2156, 4 May 1886, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
47A DIVORCE CASE. [BY TELEGRAPH.-OWN CORRESPONDENT.] Dunedin, Monday. Waikato Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2156, 4 May 1886, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in