Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAWN TENNIS. Cambridge v. Hamilton.

TftK return m.itcli between the Cambridge and Hamilton Liwn Tennis Clubs came off on tho courts of tho latter on Saturday last, and resulted in :i dociMvo Mctory for the home team. Ah was tho case with the Hamilton pliuers when wsihngCambndge, the MKitor* pl.^ed on unf.iunh.ir ground and sutferred to some extent in consequence, but it muit be .id nutted that their play on tho whole wus inferior to their opponent-.'. Cimhrulge was represented by Mevns Hunt, Kdgar, StubbiiifT, Hartley, Fit/gorald ami Simms, and Hamilton by Messis W.illnut, Yon Stunner, Smith, Seddon, Hay and McLernon. Mr J. 11. \Vh\te was selected to play, but o*ing to his hav in},' to proceed to Auckland In-. place was taken by Mr Hay, who in his turn lud been aelectod aioneof the»iiginul team. The conditions were, be->t out of thieo -.eti, host two pairs out of three to w in. As will be socn from the following scoie, C.mi bridge did not hucceed in winning a single *rt :— Messrs Smith and Seddon v. Messis Stubbing and Hartley. l-,r Shr. Hamilton ' ; Ciiinbridgo - 2nd Skt. Hamilton (>( > Cambridge ' Messro Wallnutt and Yon Stunner v. Messrs Hunt and Edgar. 1-,) Ski. Hamilton •' Cambridge 4 2nmi Htr. Hamilton '• Ctimbridgo Messrs Hay and McLernon \. Mes-i-, l-'it/gerald and Simms. Ihi Sri. H>imi!ton (> Cambridge - 2nd Sf r. Hamilton •> Canibnd«e I Hamilton thus won by li sets to nil. SubM-tmently Mes-,is W.illnutt and Yon Stunner pla\ed off a tliiid set against Messrs Hunt and Kdgar, and won by '» to 4. Mews Smith and Seddon aNo played out the thud set, and beat Mow-, Stubbing and Hartley by <i to 4. Thico Miigle set--followed. Mi W.illnut beat Mi Kdjr.u, •» to 3; Mr Yon Stuiiuei bent Mi Hunt, l! to ] in two sets; and Mr Mcljeinon be it Mi Kit/.yerald, |, to 2. Mi C. (J. Uoale and Mr./. M. Franklin performed the onerous duties of uinpue and s';oret, iospeiti\elj, in .v in. inner which gave tho gieatest s.it)-.-faction to all concerned. It is intended to play a tliiid match at Cambridge on the 31st inst, when some good tennis may bo looked foiw.ud to. Doubtless the inembors of both flubs will practice assiduously m tho inteisal.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18851013.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2070, 13 October 1885, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
368

LAWN TENNIS. Cambridge v. Hamilton. Waikato Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2070, 13 October 1885, Page 2

LAWN TENNIS. Cambridge v. Hamilton. Waikato Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2070, 13 October 1885, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert