R.M. COURT, CAMBRIDGE.

Waikato Times, Volume XXIV, Issue 1970, 21 February 1885, Page 3

R.M. COURT, CAMBRIDGE.

[jiV m.hl.KU'H.] CVMItUMH.F, Flld.VY. Ar the K.M. Court to day, befoie Mi H. W. Xoitheroft, K.M., judgment foi plain till «ai gnen in the following ca^ : - McUany \. Heashp ; Tucker v. H.iy ; Mmris v. five difierent nathes; Bennett v. Hoy ; Bennett v. J. Lamb; Bennett \. Pi'ina To Keie; Bennett v. Fair bum ; Bennett v. Nepio. Te Ran ; Bennett v. H. Cookc ; Bennett \. Hon Nen; Bonnett v. 11. HicUmiu; Bennett v. Hoy. The pl.imhff, Bennett, in these Cdses is a ceititicated accountant in bankruptcy m the estates of McVfayh and (ioodfellow. Mr Keesing appealed for plaintiff. A number of other -milmouse* in these estates are yet uuMJivod. Judgim-nt w.vs confesned in a number of cue-*, others were settled out of court, .vnd several weio adjoin ned. Th« case <if W. J. Hunter v. W. A. Murray, for connni^ion, occupied thecnirt f t) r borne time. Mr Dyer appeared foi plamtift, and Mr H.vy for defendant. Judgment was gi\en for plaintiff. The case of Hay v. Menick, which w.vs an action on a guarantee gnen by Mi Mernck and others for expenses incunvd in the case of Arekatera v. the Pateteie Company, was dismissed for want of juiisdietion. Notice of appeal was given. S. (Jewish was chained with burning fur/,e and rubbish in the township. He was di&is.issod with a c.ution.