RESIDENT MAGISTRATES' COURT, HAMILTON.
Yesterday.—Befqijoj fiant* rMoßhersoii, J.P., and His j • Breach of the Borough By-laws. | was charged with driving over the Hamil--^^afficf at^dtl^r thsjqra Walking pace. ' '' j an urgent message .tha^t his child was il(, and wa,s in a hurry,'though as a matter of fact, he did not trot, but only ambled his horses. - j ' , Sergt. McGo\:ern said if the defendant had given 1 tfij| excuse o thi- rie.tt' da&f We would not nave proceeded witn'the chavge. /"' M?tf ,■ ri J The Bench cautioned the defendant, and ordered him to pay the coste 7s. i
Breach of the Licensing Act. i - Arthur Bach, licensee of the Roy^l Hotel, Hamilton East, was charged, o>n the information of Sergt. MeGovern, with having comrmt^ed-a^ $£§ acM °f *Ke Licensing Act by permitting liquor—to wit two &fiilllngsworth|of wliisky4-t«J 1$ soldi in \d House on SiWay'laW.* '*!•./. /; •
Constat(le, tMiirray /deposed, that at about 11 a.im on Sunday he saw a boy Vfinittd. Alexander Smith,, in/ froiit^pf Royal Hotel with .v bottle in hik hand, in which he,isaicl ..was, [twp shillings' worth of whisky, tor his mother, whicii had been served to him by, ftjrsj Bach. "Witness went inside, and saw several, men in the tap-room. He did not see them drinking, but there was beer on tlie table. Mrs Jkeh-., ,was in the bar. On enquiring fpr Mr Bach * witness was told \\o was upstairs. The boy Smith lived, principally with his'm'other iu J Hamilton East. " " 1 , The lad 'Smith', i who,. though som|e, fourteen yeirs ot age, appeared to have rather foggy ideas on ,the subject of the oath, was examined. ' He sajd'ihe had come in from his'father's fafrn'on tlie 'Piako road on Sunday morning and the whisky was for, his father. He lived.on the farm sometimes/and sometimes'with his mother, in Hamilton. , ; , This was tjie case for the police. For the defence, Mr' Bach-called Alexander Smith, father of the last witness, who deposed that the' boy fhad gone for the whisky • for him. He lived over three miles from Hamilton. :'lff: 'Iff anWe'r to the (Bench,' witne'As said' it vronlfrbe three milesr by/tb^tpfcl/but he always went through,,f/J-pt. Steele's property, whiclj made ib/j'nioh'ahbVter. The .Bench mlljcted a(l^ue bf^J]* Vl^V 1^ costs, Us 6d, intimating,to,the defendant that the law made ,it r imperative tha,t his license should be endorsed.
■ Civil Case's,!' ",'f''>' . In the following ciises* judgment, >vas given for plaintiff's 'with coats":— 'jAmes Martin v. ,1. Graham' ;' same v. J Ellison ; Gelling j;.,Cumming, lor ra^cs ; Colentian v, CabSicly, vi claim' 'iio B^'2tl for meat/ snppli'ed (costs £5 8s). Mr 'O'Neill '>appea'ied' for' plaintiff in the last-named
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18830308.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XX, Issue 1665, 8 March 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
429RESIDENT MAGISTRATES' COURT, HAMILTON. Waikato Times, Volume XX, Issue 1665, 8 March 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.