THE PRIVILEGE QUESTION.
The following is the report‘of Privilege Committee brought up on Monday : ; ( 1. Your Committee iii' obe4i®uoe { to the urgency itilljhsfed ' Upoc? tl&m n by the House, met ’ the, adjournment, ;o£.i the. Friday last, and have- sinoe tt/hengiven 1 Undivided ■ • attention l to. *the subject iemittpdto them; • •Aiiiiple disonssions have" taken pl^<*h ( ,an;d careful research after precedents have been ' 2. Your Committee find that the : precedents examined, apcf: .thfijfrecords of Parliaments, writers bn constitutional history passim , establish or recognise the* principle, that any notice by thd 5 ' Crown of any matter irtagitatiion* ox* debate inParliamept, but by information or agreement of is au infringement of Parliament. 3. They ajjply these .principles *l° the memorandum oi hii Excell ondy the- Governor of s7fh Pctpbei; as laid on the table of the House £f Representatives by command of bis |
Excellency, upon the advice of Ministers, in which, Excellency declines to talwlne%|g vice of his Ministers, cpSM tion to whkh he othermseW led noj that a voWoflwant BeonMi ice it [The ol '^wt ■ 0 raudutn, clined to appoint MrNjViwon, are _, ,4. Tlinbr yip irißfrjfflLJj^ niittee have oeen una Die to come to any other conclusion than the l'ol■iQw.ing.: That the action "ffxcellency The 7 mWßM,m^til\lMif -tW j Mimsters, was an lnfringemejQjr < f the privilogejagfrtfaff House.
5 * re P° rfc k er ?~ IUgS. .«,fj WTr ,*r bn* (Mo*UtT j , sth STeVemleP, 1878 M T the above reporj, ana gave notice He&so*tt»fou.'g*ii& tb«HSi MmPti&bo&fing'Whe pr<iwas carried to 19. rhb divisßorfllist'T wpa asSr&llttWfll—Ayes, 32^Batgettb;©alfefi!tf/#&tyiW&wi „ J. C.miap.eM 3, J. E. (Asly Hislof,, Mont, gomery, Nabe, "* ORorke, Pyke, KelJse™KusseTl, "SeatoH," Shrimsk, Stoat, Swanson, Takamoana, Thonson, V^ettoict'W^B^wi )d ( W < Noe<lsi J jJ:t&inßon, Bo«ven, Brati-* don, Fitzroy, Fox, Gibbons, l£untei,a HursthodSe£ Macfarlant, McLean, Morris, Ormond, Richate™n > Sutfcol/1 W>®fc- sufi v\ .yti ioO 944-m TsJjt bna r .-.Ai oj **«**.* gaiijjOJamber 6. WaitfißSh m'JiiiMffilFit held fa-,
the %^W r csac§;ffocjmtbc27 C u u fcimo lu accordance 1 wftf'uOT&rtisemei t to elect a membe'f i '6i*ft2<S a .BsJrtf, in pta e ° Taerrf prtsentln persoa and. thrs# by proxy. Mr F M.orrin was tf&ftfcr to the ohaur. i Mqßiira. J Cpohcaaeaud (jLGould were and aitor the voW*m« t«fea"ar»^r a ne-w l * declared duly.electda I ,'lre"tfiVidg had tie Vbm i ««Mr *V Cam] > bell Board, aad ifKWW'. B »» r « t lfe,i»P to a,e< can ,gwfaooey i»t ,he i? ood U ioffice .fa - deot, . and t&e amount of rates 1 cnis ytSr WcSnsiderab y lesa jthau in former year*. It' is to Ikj noped the Government subsidy. to.Jß.oi ,d B>»rds will be fortuconnng. ; '< There isjadnfe'i M g the telegraph to the district.-sjfw n
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18771108.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume X, Issue 842, 8 November 1877, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
429THE PRIVILEGE QUESTION. Waikato Times, Volume X, Issue 842, 8 November 1877, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.