R.M. COURT ALEXANDRA. (Before Major Mair, R. M.)

Waikato Times, Volume X, Issue 706, 23 December 1876, Page 2

R.M. COURT ALEXANDRA. (Before Major Mair, R. M.)

Scott v. Roger?. This wti an information for a*«ault. Mr Wfaitaker for informant. Informant depoied, that he vti driving cattle out off his land, when defendant came up and aslitd him why he dogged hit cattle. Informant laid they were on hit land. Defendant then ruahed at him/ and seizing him by tbe leg, tried to uabono htm. Informant then struck at defendant, with a dog ohaio, when defendant went to the hedge and took therefrom two ti-tree sticks, with which he struck informant. This was tho assault com* plained of. Allen Henderson corroborated the former witneis. This was the informants X 3410. Defendant baring made a statementThe Court said the case had been dearly made -out, and fined defendant £1, and costs, £4 19j.

G*ANT Y. NOKGSOVB In this omo the information wm for iHegal detention of a bull, the property of the informant. Defendant wm Poundkteper. Mr Wbitaker. appeared for the defendant. He objected to the iafor> mation, which di>l not diacloie any offence and wm too yagnt. (The information w*s diimiwed with OOltl.

Saxkv. Sake Mr Whitaker for Defendant. 'Information 'for neglect to girt notice of the impounding of • ball, contrary to the 18th Seotion of the Impounding Act, 1876 After plaf ntiff had doted hi» cms, Mr Whitaker, pointed out that the Aot w»s not in evidence, and the oaae wai diimuied with coat.

Same v. Sami This wu an f nformation for the neglect to post » notice oa the Pound, of 'the impounding of informant* ball, contrary to Section 37 of the 'Impounding Act, 1876. Mr Whftaker for defendant. Mr Wnitalrer objected, "that it hall not been shewn that the bull was impounded for trespass . Informant had therefore- closed hi* case, without shewing that defendant wsa liable under the Section 37, for a breech of which clause the 'information bad bern laid. Information dismissed with costs. The costs in 'these three cases were missed, «nd totalled '£4 6s.

CIVIL SIDE. -Sloan* v. Brtjntoh. Mr WhiUker for plaintiff, Mr Maddea for d«fdnd»at. Claim— £ll 13i 7d. 'Goods told and delivered. The evidence wu of 'no publio intrefct. Judgement for pUiatiff, for Amount claimed, and oosti, £8 9d]6d. T. Woods v. ißobbkt Alkx^der. Mr'M»id«n for def«nd»at , Tho aTidence wu doToid of publio 'intrest. Jadj;m«ak<ors£3« withecatf, Wi.

Shobt v. McKikder. Mr Whicaker for plaintiff. Action for detention of a heifer, the property of the plaintiff. Cl»im--£l5 its volne. After a great de%l of evidence >h»d b«en tfciien, .plaintiff ww nontnited with cotte.