BUSH RESERVES.
Snt,— HoWeYW unwilling I m*y be to enter into any controversy, Twcannot refrain from flommeathig on the "vtfry 'lengthy but vaguC'and ilwoniftt- ' «nt letter Of "W J, *wbich appeared in your paper of the 27th mit on the lubject 'ot bush md the actton'twkeh by the of Hamilton to prevent their sale 'to private pe*« tons. I say'Yagut>,'beoaiue >I fill to obierre any rprsoticable or ttMfol fluggestions •iccept 'in a ••limatio and sanitary sense, which I consider moorfshine ; anil it 'is inconsistent, because 'although hi; «pproYdrttf'th» atetidn taken te :pt»'vent 'tbeir sale pyet he characterises the movers in the matter m ' V utnbler » vwhD *** * cfcnmted byitolfithtntftlVe*;" 'While -maWngurt of-iuoh language ha thouid teplsin the tndtlTet by which th»y Wert>-*«timted, which, ! I 'feel nsiured he is 'unabfo'to'do.iand'l am aurprised that any person ' eotold write would b» guilty of Ilttri-■buting-ieJfiih motire* to the inhabitants of any 'diitnot »whilit engaged 'ln nsuch a ,pMiswotthy m moyenient tt'the prdrention of -the -«ale of nny 'hushe« nn 'their diitriot. Such language 'from >atiy!per«on dMsrrei the'inoit decided rtprehen* / : »ipn, and I' regret that I am not better Able to .gire'it him hot and strong, at he deserve!, or I 'wWild maJta him feel the climatic influence whi*h '■he to tauoh adrocated. 'He says there u a phase 'of the question orerlooked by thoie persons moyHing'io thßtaattor-^tnd that phait it 'the ©lima1 tie and unitary influence of thefe bushes. Now 'lask, Mr Editor, -who would 'hate 'thought of '•^lich a thing ? Why,' none bfct ft tUionary. AixA 'he would 'haye 'too trees cue down, but would let tkem |row, and not only 'that, but he would "'compel er«ry settler to plant trees on his land. V- What an arbitrary expro»tion. If 'he 'would' bkftfio trees cut down, I ask him where we are Ito get our timber for building, for firewood, for ! ports »nd rail*,Vfcc. 'Perhaps like Mr' Joe Hinton (wuo ireheonljrtnau who go** 'in for the sale of then bushes in Hamilton) bs ha* mad* a 'big hole in the Te Hahu bu*h, And considers that 1 thej should taye a spelL He saya "the "cry "we want the 'bush« 3 for 'firewood sounds ludicrous in View of tho fact that it emanates from -wealthy Settlers 'well tble, one "would think, 'to live without Government assutaace." I deoy ' that bhey"want Government 'assistance, ' an'd that *a« the bushes were publio property they belong u -nolely to the public, and' the -people of Hamiltoii ™ JbaA a, perfect right to prevent their «ale. 'It ia >ponible that W J'ha* rtoeiYed tnore 'gOYernment 'assistance' than «nny person present meeting in -a pfminiitrj sunie. Hiavo'tio timeeir to qu6te«tiy tore from his •JeVUr.'iior .would I 1I 1 if L I tad, without incurring •the risk 'Of being eon«i<tered prossy.— l am, Ac, 'HiHßiiton, \pnla<Sth,'lSr6.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18760429.2.15.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume X, Issue 615, 29 April 1876, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
464BUSH RESERVES. Waikato Times, Volume X, Issue 615, 29 April 1876, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.