Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Lawyors Enanged at a Verdict

— t — Ludicrous' 1 Justice"

Another striking example of tlu ludicrous incapability of Italian justice ocour. red in Milan yesterday, when the trial of Alberto Olive for the murder of his wife was concluded, telegraphed a Homo correspondent on June, 12th, Tho married lifo led by tho unhappy eouplo was far frciu smooth, Although Olive was considerate, economical, and preciso, his wife gave him many hours of bitlor anguish by her hose conduct, and hor bohaviour finally bocamo 100 much , for him. On tho nigtn of May 16th last your in a lit ol rage, ho killed her, and cut her body into suhll piecoa, which he threw away, 110 then gave himself tip to tho police and mode «full eonfcHsion.

During the past tweive days all Italy has been more or less interested in tho dotails of this tragedy ns they wero gradually unfolded in the law courts at Milan.

When llio Jiuljjo put (he qik-Hiion to (he jury,"Did Olivostiikohi.s wife with (In. intention to kill ?" the answer was " No." Immediately them was a tremendous uprout in court, tlio friends of (ho iimncd cliooriuj; wildly, while tlio lawyers and others taking part in tlio trial uttered cries of protest ajiainst so tla«niiit a departure (ioiu justice. Finally the prisoner was sentenced to oloven days' imprisonment and linod i'.j for mulilatiii" the body of a dead person. As he Ims already boon imprisoned for several months, ho was immediately set at liberty. It appears that the jury did not intend to let the prisoner ofi so easily, but expected (hut the Judge would, us is usually the case, put ano'lir ijnestinn --namely, Did the victim (fio horn the effects of the blow struck by the prisoner? which they would Imvii answered in the aliiruhtiyo, and the prisoner would have loci) liable to eight years' pcnul norviluc'e. Olivo on being c inducted from (he court \ remarked, •'] expected lo net eight yours 1 imprisonment, Inn not such good fortune r.s this," Tin' verdict,eouiiii'.; »fter two or time similar ruses in this country has cutis.d a feeling of revulsion amont! all i right-minded people, All (lie papers ilej mand that such truvorsi" of jii3!ico sball ' be slopped,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WHDT19040812.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume IV, Issue 1065, 12 August 1904, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
368

Lawyors Enanged at a Verdict Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume IV, Issue 1065, 12 August 1904, Page 3

Lawyors Enanged at a Verdict Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume IV, Issue 1065, 12 August 1904, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert