Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WELLINGTON DOCK CONTRACT.

A SPECIAL CASE.

(Per United Press Association.)

, WELLINGTON, November L In the special case, Pritcarthly and Co. v. John McLean and Son, litigation arising out of the stopping of'the Wellington dock contract the Chief Justice held that there was no undertaking on the part .df yhe defendants to order sand and gravel beyond what was required. Counsel for defendants asked for judgment on the claim for £20,000, contending that the effect of Sir Robert Stout’s decision was that the plaintiffs had not a course of action. Motion for judgment was deferred, till. Wednesday next?

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WH19111102.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXXVI, Issue 13522, 2 November 1911, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
97

WELLINGTON DOCK CONTRACT. Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXXVI, Issue 13522, 2 November 1911, Page 2

WELLINGTON DOCK CONTRACT. Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXXVI, Issue 13522, 2 November 1911, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert