CHARLESTON.
(from our own correspondent.)
RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. (Before T. G. Macarthy and Joseph Henry, Esqs., J.P.s) Thursday, Max 27.
Murphy v. Pair.—Claim for £6 for refreshments supplied by plaintiff to defendant from the 4th to 27th May. Mr Shapter appaared for plaintiff. Margaret Murphy stated—l dismissed plaintiiffrom my service on the 4th May. She stayed in my house until the 27th. She asked me to accommodate her until she got married. 1 objected, saying I had not sufficient accommodation, but she said it was sufficient.
Cross-examined by Mr Fair : I did not find her a profitable barmaid, and I told her I wished her to leave. I did not ask her to stay, stating that there would be no charge made. For tho defence Mrs Pail? statedPlaintiff told me she could not afford to pay me, and I said I had a month to
decide upon what course I was to adopt. She said I could stop for six weeks or three months if I wished without any charge being made I did nearly the same amount of* work as when 1 was paid. Mr Shatter addressed the court in support of the plaintiff's case Judgment deferred until to-morrow. In consequence of the absence of Mr Broad, thoro was no Warden's Court held.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18710729.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Westport Times, Volume V, Issue 843, 29 July 1871, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
214CHARLESTON. Westport Times, Volume V, Issue 843, 29 July 1871, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.