Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT.

Monday, May 9. (Before J. Giles, Esq., E.M.) Thomas Perkins and John "Webb, charged with drunkenness, were fined 10s each. OBSCENE AND ABUSIVE LANGUAGE. Ann Connolly, an old offender, was charged, on the information of Jane Lockyer, with using language calculated to provoke a breach of the peace. Complainant stated that about 8 o'clock on Friday morning, the 6th inst, she went to a Mrs Kent's to see a carpenter named Sibree whom she wanted to move a house for her. Defendant was there, and as soon as she saw her, commenced to use bad language, also followed her up the street, abusing complainant and throwing stones at her. The evidence of Sibree and Mrs Kent corroborated complainant's statement. Defendant made a statement to the effect that the charge had been made out of malice by the women Lockyer and Kent, and that she was a peaceful woman whose only fault was taking an occasional drop of beer. His worship considered the information substantiated and ordered defendant to enter upon her own recognizance of £SO and two sureties of £25 each to keep the peace for three months.

VAGRANCY. Ann Connolly and Jane Loekyer were charged, under the Vagrant Act with being disorderly persons having no lawful visible means of support. The evidence against the first-named accused was that she had never been known to do any work, and that improper characters had been in the habit of resorting to her dwelling. Four previous convictions were also put in. Similar evidence as regards drunkenness was also adduced against Jane Loekyer. His, Worship was of opinion that both characters were a nuisance to the neighborhood in which they resided, and it would be a relief to the community if both were imprisoned for three months. Should they be again brought before him, he should inflict as heavy a penalty as the law would permit. In the present he thought the charges had not been sufficiently made out, and the prisoners would be discharged.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18700510.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Westport Times, Volume IV, Issue 656, 10 May 1870, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
335

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT. Westport Times, Volume IV, Issue 656, 10 May 1870, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT. Westport Times, Volume IV, Issue 656, 10 May 1870, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert