Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT.

(Before J. Giles Esq., E. M.) Thursday, July 29. Thomas Braithwaite, charged with bigamy, was again remanded for eight days', witnesses from Canterbury and Oiago not having arrived. Friday, July 30. Benjamin Saunders was charged with deserting his wife and family at Greymouth. The defendant said that he had left Greymouth with his wife's consent, for the purpose of looking for work, and though he had not yet got regular employment, he hope"d to be able to send his family some money, and to arrange for their passage hither. He would endeavor to send them £2 a week. The Magistrate made an order for the weekly payment of £l.

CIVIL CASES. Suisted v. Bell.—A claim of £l. The defendant did not appear. The plaintiff's statement was that he had bought from the defendant a consignment of sheep, pigs, &c. He offered the defendant for the stock £lOl, but the defendant said he would not take less than £LUS, but he would give him a " luck-penny " of£l. The plaintiff paid the defendant a cheque for £lO5, but the defendant then refused to give the " luck-penny," and went away in the steamer Murray. The Magistrate said that, had there been any appearance of the defendant, he might have doubts as to their being consideration for the money, but, in the absence of any answer, the case was sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to judgment. West v. Noble.—Judgment had been given against the defendant, a digger at the Upper Buller, for the amount of a baker's bill, but he failed to satisfy it. He was examined as to his means, and he stated that he was at present unable to pay. He had sold his share in a claim, and was working for wages—£l 10s a week, to be paid if the gold were got in the ground. He had paid a sum due by him for timber, and could not meet this amount at present. The plaintiff thought that everybody " should pay his baker before he paid a timber man." Judgment was given for payment at the rate of £2 a week, and, failing payment, the defendant would be liable to be imprisoned for two months.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18690731.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Westport Times, Volume III, Issue 537, 31 July 1869, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
367

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT. Westport Times, Volume III, Issue 537, 31 July 1869, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT. Westport Times, Volume III, Issue 537, 31 July 1869, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert