Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDEN'S COURT.

Friday, Jan. 29. (Before J. Giles, Esq.; Warden.) Alexander M'Crae, bootmaker, was charged, on the information of Constable Neville, with carrying on business without a business license. The defendant's statement was that until lately he had been digging, and was unable to pay the license until Thursday. The Warden could not entirely overlook a case of the kind. To allow people to neglect paying their licenses until they were summoned would only encourage a breach of the law. He would impose a small fine of £l, with 13s. costs. The defendant: I cannot pay it, your Worship. The Warden: In default of payment, imprisonment for three days. A similar case against one Whitly was withdrawn, the summons bavin" been mis-sen el. Eccles v. Patterson.—The complaint of the complainants in this case was that the respondents were illegally draining water from Deadman's creek, and not complying with section 10 of the Regulations, by which a sluico-head of 20 inches of water must be left free for use. Mr Tyler appeared for the complainants, and, after stating the difference between the old and tho new Regulations, called evidence with the intention of showing that the water was wanted for general use. Under the old regulations, race-holders were bound to leave two sluice-heads. The complainants only asked for one. The Warden thought it would be un-

satisfactory to give a decision without the evidence of a surveyor as to the creek, and the possibility of any other source of water supply. These cases were important. It was a serious matter that holders of water-races should be cut off, and equally important that other parties should not be excluded, and, to give the complainants time to obtain the services of a surveyor, he adjourned the case.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18690130.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Westport Times, Volume III, Issue 459, 30 January 1869, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
294

WARDEN'S COURT. Westport Times, Volume III, Issue 459, 30 January 1869, Page 2

WARDEN'S COURT. Westport Times, Volume III, Issue 459, 30 January 1869, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert