Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Thursday, Augutt 19. (Before his Honor Judge Clarke ane a special jury of four.) RAHSON V. POETEE. This case which had been adjourned from the previous day was resumed, the plaintiff having closed his case with bis own evidence on Wednesday. The jury wished to recall the plaintiff in order to examine him in reference to some points that they were not clear on, and Mr. Sanson accordingly was again sworn. In reply to a question plaintiff said that the £SO which should have been paid by him on the agreement being signed, bad not been paid, as he never could get a lease. His Honor enquired if he had ever taken possession, and he replied that he had gone into the house but as he could never get a title, he had not paid the money. If he had got the house he would have cancelled the debt now sued for, besides paying the two sums of £SO and £96. He was nine weeks in the house bnt found he was getting into debt by remaining and gave it up. He admitted having been in partnership with Fred Smith, Adam Porters former partner during that time, and goods were obtained by the firm of Sanson and Smith. His sole reason for withdrawing was that he could not get the deeds from which a lease could be drawn. Several witnesses were examined by defendants counsel, whose evidence went to prove that they had supplied goods to Sanson and Smith for the Imperial Hotel,

His Honor told the jury that the defendant had called witnesses that had nothing whatever to do with the case. The question was simply what was owing to the plaintiff. The jury after a short deliberation returned a verdict for the plaintiff for £lB9 10s. and costs; being £LO 10s. less than the amount claimed. The court then adjourned till this day at 11 o'clock. The appeal cases will be proceeded with to day, and are two in number only. A case will be brought forward for the opinion of the court under the 72nd. section of the Goldfie'de Act The Bankruptcy business will then be gone on with, but it is not of an important character. There are six applicants for final discharges.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18680821.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Westport Times, Volume II, Issue 330, 21 August 1868, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
377

Untitled Westport Times, Volume II, Issue 330, 21 August 1868, Page 2

Untitled Westport Times, Volume II, Issue 330, 21 August 1868, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert