Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Thursday, March 12. (Before Gk W. Lighband, Esq., J.P.) Susan Lowe was fined £1 for being drunk and disorderly. WAEDEN'S COUET. Simpson v. Kennedy and others. — This was a case involving an amount of £3 6s 6d for certain timber supplied, in which judgment had been given a few days before for the defendants, but a re-hearing before assessors had been granted to allow of some fresh evidence being brougnt forward. The following gentlemen were selected as assessors : —James Jones, Edmund Twohill, Wm. Hunter and Neil Black. A vast number of witnesses were called on either side, the hearing of the case occupying the Court the whole forenoon, but the actual facts lay in a very small compass. The question at issue mainly turned upon whether the giving to plaintiff a certain list of sizes for timber constituted an order. Plaintiff insisted that it did; and that, moreover, a verbal'order was given by Mr Kennedy."!:, This was contradicted by both Mr Kennedy and Mr J. L. Clarke, who gave the list referred to, and there was a good deal of contradictory swearing on both sides. The assessors dccideded in favor of plaintiff, giving judgment for amount claimed and £5

13s cost?. Against this decision it is the intention of the defendants, Ave believe, to appeal. Hannix v. Williams. —Complainant claimed £lO for the defendant for the defendant unlawfully mining in the plaintiff's dam. Case dismissed. John Blakely v. Arthur Johnston. — For refusing to give up a certain certificate of registration for an extended claim No. 37a. Judgment for plaintiff, and 15s costs; certificate to be given up to plaintiff. JJlrich Starch v. Joseph Waterman. —For refusing to pay plaintiff" the sum of £ls 5s for keeping possession for defendant of section No. 254 for the space of 30 weeks. Case dismissed. The following cases were also dismissed :— John Coldreth v. Roderick Scanlan and Party, Stewart and Parti/ v. Chas. Richter, Johnson and Party v. Nbrrish aud Party.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18680316.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Westport Times, Volume II, Issue 195, 16 March 1868, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
330

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Westport Times, Volume II, Issue 195, 16 March 1868, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Westport Times, Volume II, Issue 195, 16 March 1868, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert