S.M. COURT.
MASTER-TON—FRIDAY. (Before Mr, T. Hutchison, S.M.) J, C. Ingram v, Sixb Kke,—This was a case in which accused was charged with allowing rotten fruit and other rubbish to accumulate on his premises in Queon-stroot! The offence having been proved, the S.M. said accused was liablo to a lino of £7, but as this was a first offenco bo would only inflict a fine of 5s with 7s costs. J.. 0. Ingram v. A, Stempa.— Charged with allowing his chimnoy to take-fire. Fined 5s and costs ss, G. Arnold v. Karaituxa Kurou. —This was a case in which plaintiff charged defendent with assault, Afterconsiderabloevidencehadbeen taken, His Worshipsaid tho evidence showed that provocation was given to Karaitiana Kurou by Arnold attempting to strike him with a level. The case was dismissed. [Left Sittixo.]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18951206.2.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 5200, 6 December 1895, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
133S.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 5200, 6 December 1895, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in