Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A SEPARATION CASE.

(By Tolegraph, -Press Association)

f Ciikistchukcu, Thursday, The appeal in the case Elmers v. Elmers, was heard yesterday. The wife, it appears, had agreed 011 tho payment by the husband of £3OO, to a separation order, and the husband was, it is alleged, relieved of all the responsibility of maintenance. She sued for maintenance, and Mr! Beetham, S.M., held tho deed of separation afforded no ground of of defence,

Judge Denniston upheld this view, and said the Destitute Persons Act provided that while a woman had a husband able to maiutain her, no contract between parties, could relieve the husband of that duty, j

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18941213.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4901, 13 December 1894, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
107

A SEPARATION CASE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4901, 13 December 1894, Page 3

A SEPARATION CASE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4901, 13 December 1894, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert