S.M. COURT.
JUSTERTON.-'I'HURSbAY. (BeforoMrT.Hutcliisou,S.M,) ClVlli CASK, 0. A.; Pownall v. Mrs Dow.— Claim, £2 2s for professional Bei--vices. Judgment with costs by do. fault. . . - ' J. Mandel v. Edgar Joncß.'of Wei-lingtou.-Claim, £2410, amount of dishonored promissory note. Judgment with costs by dofuult,',!; A CI. Manning y, R, ihy<m,~. Claim, £6 4s, balance of accorsJrdue for work done.' Judgment wiik.costß by default, ■:: WT i \ : It." Bright v. ttiPinhey.-Mr Bumiy (for Ifi' Tate) appeared for, plaintiff, and Mr Pownall for defen-' dant. This was an action to recover possession of a property,in the occupation of defendant, and owned by; plaintiff. •■. .'■;!,- "After'bearing consitlorablo oviueiico tlie Court declined to maktinn order ro possession of'' tho tenement, , but gave judgment foi: tlip ambtuit ' of rent owing.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18941115.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4877, 15 November 1894, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
120S.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4877, 15 November 1894, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in