S.M. COURT.
I'EATIIERSTON-MONDAY. ' (From Our Own Con'espondent) There was very little business done i|i tlioS,M. Cpuv.t tlilf mprning, there being two cqses' only. The first was for judgment summons iu the plaint Cuudy v. Sear), Mr Aclieson appearing of Mr W, Cundy, As thero was not sufficient'evidence shown to prove that Mr Searl hits had sufficient money in hand to pay Mr Cundy, His Worsljip adjourned the case tillriext Coiu't-aay,'to allow further evidence to be produced, The case Dixon Bros. v. Searl,
1 claim' 199 10s Id, application to bo heard in Mustorton, was also adjourned tillnoxt Court-day, This being all tho business the Court then adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18940806.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4792, 6 August 1894, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
107S.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4792, 6 August 1894, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in