S.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4783, 26 July 1894, Page 2

S.M. COURT.

'MASTERTON.-THUBSDAY.

(Before Mr T. Hutchison, S.M.)

C. Anketqllv, KaraitianaKprou. —His gavo; jadgmout in this case,; iniyhich plranMsued defendant for- ss,' as rent fwPSplain. tiff to defendant for land a&Akura, not; exist/'witUi.i»jthe'KQtxndaries'^6 i , fined, His Worship held'that the [agreement between plaintiff and defendant, '-.was . Void, and that the defendant had undertaken to givo t» the plaintiff that which he liad not ■ or had never had since.: Tho ques ; tion of estoppel, lie considei-ed,raised by the defence, ivas irrelevant. He wouM therefore give, judgment for plaintiff- for amount 'claimed;-with costs £1 Is, : V i •'!lios.' Cox v, J} W.ebb.—Claim for • £2 lOs fid. Mr Beal'A for plaintiff, Mr PownallfoiVi defendant, .vT. Cox,' plaintiff stated that ho was claiming ; thp anibunt for certain fiirnitnro, whicli he had left in a house leased fronrhim by defendant, Produced'-an-inventory of , articles which-defendant- had chased from witness in wliidli.' tlio ■1 articles Bued for. James Webb, defendant, deposed,that Jie leased a shop from plaintiff • and : told him (plaintiff) to take t away the things that ho required and; lie would buy tho balance, Plaintiff asked s4oforthemj but witness said it was too much, and told him to tuke away what he wanted. Had never given the inventory to ■ tiff, had only made" for it his 6wn guidance in making an offer. In giving judgment, His Worship said thattho fact of tho defendant having made an; inventory! for} bis his own use went against him ratber than with him. Ho would give judgment for plaintiff for amount churnedwith costs of court. wt The court then adjourned until 2 o'clock,