S.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4760, 29 June 1894, Page 3

S.M. COURT.

IASjTEIITON-FIIIDAY, iforeJlr T. Hutchison, S.M.) 3r'l ( -jhiWairarapa County Council Mills McGuirc.. Mr Board for foijmiuits stated that this was formation charging defendant removal, on the 18th May, 'om the Opaki road. The oiii -which the matorial had ienw'as from the Waipoua s Cavanagli stated that ho lployed by. the Wairarapa County, Council; On the May he saw defendant cartiad of gravel from the direcf the Waipoua river bed, ards lie saw him taking the from the place. Witness efendant who had given him remove the soil. Defendant ■ed "No onu," Then witness 0, ought not to take it, This the laying of,the information, «1 \vas taken from a few yards the centra of the road line, tkcjbridgc, .Beard explained tlmt the nation was livid under section f tlio " Public Works Act.". : fendanfc .declined to -give evi-

s Worship reserved judgment, W.C. Council v. J. Blinkhorn; is information was laid, cliargho defendant with that oil the day of May, ho did on the ii'u Bead, drive a four-wheeled anger brake, with whccl-tyres of >and three-quarter inches in h, and drawn by four horses, efendant pleaded guilty, rßeard stated that, as tho offeuco ibberi committed prior to the •case', being , be would for simptya nominal penalty, : Es,Wowhip imposed a fine of Is hout costs. " i

fc Beard said ; hp hoped people old nofc think that thoy would /ays get off with this line, vlien jy broke theßy-laiv. ; His Worship explained to defennt.thatihe small fine was imposed caiiso the matter had not boon ttled by the Court ;wlien the offence committoed. If it hnpponed tain, itnvonld bonidrc serious[The Court then adjourned-